Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 General Health
 Drug News
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Other News
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others

Search Foodconsumer & Others

Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed news feed
Su bmit news[release]

More than 100 credit cards available at from, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

Food & Health : Laws & Politics Last Updated: Apr 20, 2011 - 9:38:09 AM

Stevia: What’s the Rush?
By News Release
Dec 15, 2008 - 2:27:04 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  Monday, December 15, 2008        
 Jeff Cronin, 202-777-8370, or Stacey Greene, 202-777-8316

Stevia: What’s the Rush?
Statement of CSPI Executive Director Michael F. Jacobson

Cargill and Coca-Cola are sticking their thumbs in the Food and Drug Administration’s eyes by rushing to market novel sweeteners based on the stevia plant.  Cargill has been marketing its Truvia product as a table-top sweetener for several months, and, according to media reports this week, Coca-Cola will start marketing stevia-sweetened drinks .  So far, the other main producer, Merisant, and user, PepsiCo, of a stevia-based product have held back.  A small company, Wisdom Natural Brands, put SweetLeaf sweetener on the market several months ago.

Stevia and rebaudioside A may well turn out to be entirely safe.  But until more tests have been conducted and analyzed, it is reckless for food companies to begin adding it willy-nilly to the food supply and equally reckless for the FDA to stand by mutely.

The FDA should immediately order those products off the market until all the safety testing has been done.

Though small amounts of stevia have been consumed in various dietary supplements over the years, apparently without incident, too few safety tests have been done to warrant more general use.  For starters, as two UCLA toxicologists emphasized in a report to the Center for Science in the Public Interest last summer, the FDA normally requires food additives to be tested for two years on rats and mice.  The extremely sweet chemical—rebaudioside A—in stevia has only been tested on rats.  Also, several, though not all, tests indicate that rebaudioside A causes DNA damage and mutations.  That raises the troubling prospect that it could cause cancer.

Remarkably, it is perfectly legal for companies to market whatever food ingredients they want without even informing, let alone getting approval from, the FDA.  Wisdom Natural Brands has pointedly said that it did not notify the FDA before marketing SweetLeaf.  Last May, both Cargill and Merisant notified the FDA that they considered their products to be “generally recognized as safe,” but the FDA has not yet said whether it agrees.


The Center for Science in the Public Interest is a nonprofit health advocacy group based in Washington, DC, that focuses on nutrition, food safety, and pro-health alcohol policies.  CSPI is supported by the 900,000 U.S. and Canadian subscribers to its Nutrition Action Healthletter and by foundation grants. 

© 2004-2008 by unless otherwise specified

Top of Page


Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites

We have moved to Food Consumer . Org

disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | Buy Viagra | |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | | Take Your Blog to a Higher Level
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.