Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Letter to Editor
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search






Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Submit news[release]
General health News



Get to know importance of water
Water for Life USA KYK Harmony Water Ionizer


More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

Food & Health : Technologies Last Updated: Apr 16, 2008 - 5:52:06 PM


Dry Pea, Sunflower and Spring Wheat Excel in Northern Plains Cropping
By Don Comis
Aug 27, 2007 - 4:51:54 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   

The dry pea is a “must” in the Northern Plains. Used in rotations, it has a good effect on many subsequent crop yields and is a consistent efficient user of precipitation, regardless of how dry or wet the growing season is.

An Agricultural Research Service (ARS) interdisciplinary team that includes soil scientist Donald L. Tanaka and colleagues at the Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory in Mandan, N.D., found that certain crops and their residues from no-till farming have a beneficial effect on subsequent crops, such as corn or spring wheat. In a three-year field experiment on a research farm near Mandan, the team tested 10 crops each year, for a total of 100 different crop sequence treatment combinations.

In addition to dry pea, other “must" crops for sustainable no-till cropping systems in the Northern Plains should include sunflower and spring wheat. Not only do they have a good effect on yields of subsequent crops, they also consistently use precipitation efficiently. Precipitation use efficiency, or PUE, is a measurement of pounds of grain or seed harvested per acre, per inch of precipitation received in a year. Dry pea was a standout in the study, with the best combination of yield, synergy with succeeding crops and PUE.

Corn, sorghum and millet generally produced the most crop residue, offering the best chance of protecting soil and conserving soil water. But too much residue can interfere with seed planting and reduce yields. Yields were generally lowest when a crop was planted in its own residue, or if the previous crop was a late-harvested crop such as corn or sorghum.

This may have been not only because of the heavy residue, but also because corn and sorghum are thirsty plants that can deplete soil water. The correct sequence of crops used for successive plantings proved to be important to sustainable crop production in the Northern Plains.

These and other findings from this experiment are discussed in six papers in the July-August 2007 issue of the Agronomy Journal.

ARS is the U.S. Department of Agriculture's chief scientific research agency.

Dry Pea, Sunflower and Spring Wheat Excel in Northern Plains Cropping Systems
______________________________ _____________

ARS News Service
Agricultural Research Service, USDA
Don Comis, (301) 504-1625,
donald.comis@ars.usda.gov
August 27, 2007
--View this report online, plus photos and related stories, at
www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr
______________________________ _____________





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page







Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | abou t us | newsletter | contact us
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | beyondcreditcards.com | USMortgage101.com

© Copyright 2004 - 2007 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.