Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Foodconsumer & Others


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards


Food & Health : Technologies Last Updated: Apr 20, 2011 - 9:38:09 AM


Plants make vaccine for treating type of cancer in Stanford study
By news release
Jul 24, 2008 - 6:31:21 AM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
Contact: Erin Digitale
digitale@stanford.edu
650-724-9175
Stanford University Medical Center

Plants make vaccine for treating type of cancer in Stanford study

STANFORD, Calif. - Plants could act as safe, speedy factories for growing antibodies for personalized treatments against a common form of cancer, according to new findings from the Stanford University School of Medicine. The findings came in the first human tests of an injectable vaccine grown in genetically engineered plants.

The treatments, which would vaccinate cancer patients against their malignant cells, could lead to earlier personalized therapy to tackle follicular B-cell lymphoma, an immune-system malignancy diagnosed in about 16,000 people each year.

Doctors regard follicular B-cell lymphoma as a chronic, incurable disease. The standard treatment, chemotherapy, has such severe side effects that patients often opt for watchful waiting in the early stages of illness. However, plant-grown vaccines, which lack side effects, could allow earlier, more aggressive management of the cancer.

"This would be a way to treat cancer without side effects," said Ronald Levy, MD, professor of oncology and the Robert K. and Helen K. Summy Professor in the School of Medicine, who is the study's senior author. "The idea is to marshal the body's own immune system to fight cancer."

The findings will appear July 21 in the advance online issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The study was a phase-1 trial that showed plant-grown cancer vaccines were safe for patients and could be produced quickly and cheaply. Sixteen newly diagnosed lymphoma patients received the treatment; none experienced any side effects from plant-grown vaccines.

Future studies will test the vaccine's effectiveness.

The cancer vaccines rely on a biological quirk of follicular B-cell lymphoma, which is a type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The cancer starts when a single immune cell multiplies uncontrollably, producing many identical clones of itself. The clones all carry the same antibody on their exterior, a marker that is unique to the cancer and is not found on any of the body's healthy cells. Levy's vaccination strategy is to inject many copies of the cancer-specific antibody into a newly diagnosed lymphoma patient, stimulating the patient's immune system to seek and destroy malignant cells.

Previous trials of this kind of vaccine, produced in animal cells and tested in mice and humans, have had mixed success, and the vaccines are not yet commercially available. Growing cancer vaccines in plants could circumvent some of the hurdles to turning the concept into a real treatment, Levy said.

Because each person's cancer antibody is unique, every patient needs a personalized vaccine. Growing personalized vaccines in animal cells takes months, costs thousands of dollars per patient and comes with the theoretical risk that a patient might inadvertently be infected with an animal virus that contaminated the cells used to grow the vaccine. Personalized vaccines could also be produced with genetically engineered bacteria, but bacteria-grown vaccines aren't ideal, either.

"The plant system has some advantages," said Levy, who is also a member of the Stanford Cancer Center and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator.

The researchers chose tobacco plants that were genetically engineered to reproduce quantities of the vaccine. To make a tobacco plant churn out a human antibody, scientists isolate the antibody from the patient's tumor and put the antibody gene into a modified version of the tobacco mosaic virus. They infect a tobacco plant with the gene-carrying virus by scratching the virus on its leaves. The virus takes the gene into the plant's cells, which then churn out lots of antibody. After a few days, technicians snip off the plant's leaves, grind them up and purify the antibody. Only a few plants are needed to make enough vaccine for each patient.

"The new manufacturing system allows very rapid production of a vaccine," said Charles Arntzen, PhD, a professor of plant biology at the Arizona Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, who was not involved in the research. "I think without the speed, it would be hard to convince a cancer patient to wait for a vaccine to be developed, rather than going on some other therapy."

"It's pretty cool technology," Levy said. "And it's really ironic that you would make a treatment for cancer out of tobacco. That appealed to me." None of the harmful chemicals found in cigarettes end up in the purified vaccines.

Not only is the technology fast, cheap and safe, but Levy said there's reason to expect that the plant-grown antibodies will generate a stronger immune response than those made in animal cells. Both plant and animal cells attach sugars to antibodies and other proteins during biochemical processing, but the plant and animal sugars are different. The difference might prompt a more robust immune response to plant-grown antibodies, Levy said.

The next research step is a phase-2 clinical trial to test the effectiveness of plant-grown vaccines in a larger group of lymphoma patients, Levy said. He's optimistic, adding, "We know that if you get the immune system revved up, it can attack and kill cancer."

###

The research team included scientists from Stanford, Touro University in Vallejo, Calif., and the biotechnology companies Large Scale Biology Corp., CBR International Corp., Bayer HealthCare, Integrated Biomolecule Corp., The Biologics Consulting Group Inc. and Holtz Biopharma Consulting.

The study was funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health and by Large Scale Biology Corp.

Stanford University Medical Center integrates research, medical education and patient care at its three institutions - Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital & Clinics and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford. For more information, please visit the Web site of the medical center's Office of Communication & Public Affairs at http://mednews.stanford.edu.





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












We have moved to Food Consumer . Org



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | Buy Viagra | MarketAmerica.com |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | DaytonaCPA.com | Take Your Blog to a Higher Level
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.