Wednesday October 8, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- In the so
called scientific community, you can read all types of research articles on sudden
infant death syndrome (SIDS), but remember that not all are equally convincing.
A new study published in the October issue of Archives of
Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine claimed that using a fan in the room where a
baby sleep may reduce the baby's risk of SIDS by as much as 72 percent.
The study was conducted by researchers at Kaiser
Permanente Northern California, Oakland and the University of California in
Berkeley.
For the study, De-Kun Li and colleagues compared 185 infants
who were confirmed to have suffered SIDS and 312 randomly selected infants
matched for the residence, maternal race/ethnicity and age.
Li and colleagues found fan use during sleep was linked
with a 72 percent reduced risk of SIDS. The risk reduction seemed to be more
significant in adverse sleep environments.
The researchers said in warmer rooms, using a fan could
reduce the risk by 94 percent compared to a reduction of merely 23 percent in
rooms at cooler temperatures.
"Fan use may be an effective intervention for
further decreasing SIDS risk in infants in adverse sleep environments,"
the researchers concluded.
At least 4,500 infants die from SIDS each year.
By definition, the cause of SIDS is unknown
although speculations as to how SIDS infants die have gone rampant.
A reader posted a comment in response to the report on
the study by Washington Post on the newspaper website questioning the credibility
of the study.
He/She pointed out that
SIDS occur often in the fall and winter when fan use is not common.
From what the researchers said in their study report and
if the reader’s claim is accurate, it could be that using a fan is a marker
indicative of at least one underlying risk factor: the cold
weather/room temperature is a risk factor for SIDS?
The peak incidence of SIDS was found among infants ages 2
to 3 months when they are getting a few vaccine shots.
Because of this, many scientists and laymen
as well have suspected that vaccination may have something to do with
SIDS.
But studies are inconsistent.
Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only.
The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals.
Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.