TUESDAY JULY 15, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- A new study in
the British Journal of Cancer suggests that exposure to diagnostic x-ray may
increase the risk of young-onset prostate cancer, which accounts for about 10
percent of all prostate cancer cases.
The study led by researchers at the University of Nottingham
in the UK established an association, but it did not mean exposure to
x-ray was the cause for the increased prostate cancer risk.
X-ray, as an ionizing radiation, however, has been
recognized by the U.S government as a human carcinogen, meaning exposure to it
increases cancer risk.
The study, the first of its kind, revealed a correlation
between low-dose ionizing radiation from diagnostic procedures and the risk of
prostate cancer, according to a statement issued by the University.
Exactly, the study showed that men who had a hip or pelvic x-ray
or barium enema 10 years previously were 2.5 times more likely to have prostate
cancer than the general population.
And the association seemed to be stronger in men who had a
family history of the disease.
The study was conducted by Professor Kenneth Muir, from the
Division of Epidemiology and Public Health at The University of Nottingham and
Dr Rosalind Eeles at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS
Foundation Trust.
Muir said the overall increase in the risk of developing
prostate cancer in those who had previously had certain radiological procedures was small and there was no proof that the increase in the cancer risk was caused
by radiological tests.
The study involved 431 men who were diagnosed with the
disease before the age of 60.
Considered x-ray procedures included hip and leg x-rays which
could be taken after an accident and barium meals and enemas which could be
used to diagnose conditions in the digestive system.
Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only.
The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals.
Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.