Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Foodconsumer & Others


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards


Misc. News : Non-food Things Last Updated: May 5, 2009 - 12:58:27 PM


Lyme disease on the rise
By cdc
Jun 14, 2007 - 5:29:48 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   

Lyme Disease --- United States, 2003--2005

Lyme disease is caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and is transmitted to humans by the bite of infected blacklegged ticks (Ixodes spp.). Early manifestations of infection include fever, headache, fatigue, and a characteristic skin rash called erythema migrans. Left untreated, late manifestations involving the joints, heart, and nervous system can occur. A Healthy People 2010 objective (14-8) is to reduce the annual incidence of Lyme disease to 9.7 new cases per 100,000 population in 10 reference states where the disease is endemic (Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin) (1). This report summarizes surveillance data for 64,382 Lyme disease cases reported to CDC during 2003--2005, of which 59,770 cases (93%) were reported from the 10 reference states. The average annual rate in these 10 reference states for the 3-year period (29.2 cases per 100,000 population) was approximately three times the Healthy People 2010 target. Persons living in Lyme disease--endemic areas can take steps to reduce their risk for infection, including daily self-examination for ticks, selective use of acaricides and tick repellents, use of landscaping practices that reduce tick populations in yards and play areas, and avoidance of tick-infested areas.

For surveillance purposes, a reportable case of Lyme disease is defined as 1) physician-diagnosed erythema migrans >5 cm in diameter or 2) at least one objective late manifestation (i.e., musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or neurologic) with laboratory evidence of infection with B. burgdorferi in a person with possible exposure to infected ticks (2). This surveillance case definition was developed for national reporting of Lyme disease; it is not intended to be used in clinical diagnosis (2). For this report, annual Lyme disease rates in 2003, 2004, and 2005 were calculated by county, state, and age group, using reported cases and midyear U.S. Census population estimates for each year. To limit reporting bias, analysis of symptom data was restricted to six of the 10 reference states where >90% of records included symptom information.

During 2003--2005, CDC received reports of 64,382 Lyme disease cases from 46 states and the District of Columbia; 93% of cases occurred among residents of the 10 Healthy People 2010 reference states ( Table , Figure 1 ). The average annual rate in these 10 reference states for the 3-year period was 29.2 cases per 100,000 population: 29.1 in 2003, 26.8 in 2004, and 31.6 in 2005. During 2003--2005, three counties had annual rates above 300 cases per 100,000 population in all 3 years: Columbia and Dutchess counties in New York and Dukes County in Massachusetts. Information on patient age and sex was available for 62,206 (97%) of reported cases. Median age of patients was 41 years, and patient ages followed a bimodal distribution ( Figure 2 ). Males accounted for 54% of reported cases overall and 61% of cases among children aged 5--14 years. Records for 31,961 (50%) cases specified the race of the patient; 97% were identified as white, 2% as black, and <1% as Asian/Pacific Islander or American Indian/Alaska Native.

Reported date of illness onset was available for 49,157 (76%) case reports during 2003--2005. Patients were most likely to have illness onset in May (7%), June (25%), July (29%), or August (13%); fewer than 8% were reported with illness onset during the period December--March. Records for 32,095 (50%) patients met the criteria for evaluation of symptoms. A history of erythema migrans was reported for 70% of these patients, arthritis for 30%, facial palsy for 8%, radiculopathy for 3%, meningitis or encephalitis for 2%, and heart block for <1%.

Reported by: State and District of Columbia health departments. RM Bacon, MS, KJ Kugeler, MPH, KS Griffith, MD, PS Mead, MD, Div of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic, Vector-Borne, and Enteric Diseases, CDC.

Editorial Note:

With approximately 20,000 new cases reported each year, Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States. Cases occur most commonly in northeastern, mid-Atlantic, and north-central states and among persons aged 5--14 years and 45--54 years. Cases peak during summer months, reflecting transmission by nymphal vector ticks during May and June.

Since Lyme disease became nationally notifiable in 1991, the annual number of reported cases has more than doubled. This increase likely is the result of several factors, including a true increase in disease incidence and enhanced case detection resulting from implementation of laboratory-based surveillance in several states. The growing number of case reports and the labor required for confirmation of laboratory-reported cases has placed considerable burden on local and state health departments in areas where Lyme disease is endemic. To address this surveillance burden and create more sustainable Lyme disease surveillance systems, some states have modified components of their systems, leading to acute reductions in reported cases (3). However, no evidence exists to suggest a true decrease in Lyme disease incidence in these states.

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, Lyme disease surveillance is complicated by both underreporting and overdiagnosis of cases (4,5). Second, differences in patient demographics (e.g., age and sex) among states with above-average and below-average incidence suggest variation in diagnostic and reporting practices among states (6). Finally, clinical information on symptoms is not verified independently and often is incomplete.

The Healthy People 2010 target (1) was derived from a baseline of 17.4 cases per 100,000 population reported to CDC during 1992--1996 and was established in anticipation of widespread use of a Lyme disease vaccine, licensed in 1999. However, the vaccine was withdrawn from the market in 2002, reportedly because of poor sales (7). Although no Lyme disease vaccine is available, persons can lower their risk for the disease and other tickborne illnesses by avoiding tick-infested areas when possible, using insect repellents containing DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide), and performing daily self-examination for ticks (7). In North America, removing ticks within 24 hours of attachment reduces the likelihood of B. burgdorferi transmission (8). Tick populations around homes and in recreational areas can be reduced 50%--90% through simple landscaping practices such as removing brush and leaf litter or creating a buffer zone of wood chips or gravel between forest and lawn or recreational areas. For persons who are infected, prompt diagnosis and treatment are important to prevent serious illness and long-term complications (9,10). Detailed information regarding Lyme disease prevention is available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/lyme .

References

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010 (conference ed, in 2 vols). Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000. Available at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople .
  2. CDC. Case definitions for infectious conditions under public health surveillance. MMWR 1997;46(No. RR-10).
  3. Lyme disease---Connecticut, 2005. Connecticut Epidemiologist 2006;26:13--4. Available at http://www.dph.state.ct.us/bch/infectiousdise/pdf/vol26no4_fnlclr.pdf .
  4. Naleway AL, Belongia EA, Kazmierczak JJ, Greenlee RT, Davis JP. Lyme disease incidence in Wisconsin: a comparison of state-reported rates and rates from a population-based cohort. Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:1120--7.
  5. Steere AC, Taylor E, McHugh GL, Logigian EL. The overdiagnosis of Lyme disease. JAMA 1993;269:1812--6.
  6. CDC. Lyme disease---United States, 2001--2002. MMWR 2004;53:365--9.
  7. Hayes EB, Piesman J. How can we prevent Lyme disease? N Engl J Med 2003;348:2424--30.
  8. Piesman J, Dolan MC. Protection against Lyme disease spirochete transmission provided by prompt removal of nymphal Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 2002;39:509--12.
  9. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:1089--134.
  10. Halperin JJ, Shapiro ED, Logigian E, et al. Practice parameter: treatment of nervous system Lyme disease (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2007; e-published ahead of print. Available at http://www.neurology.org/cgi/rapidpdf/01.wnl.0000265517.66976.28v1.pdf .


Table

Table
Return to top.
Figure 1

Figure 1
Return to top.
Figure 2

Figure 2
Return to top.

Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.


References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.


References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

Disclaimer   All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov .

Date last reviewed: 6/14/2007





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












We have moved to Food Consumer . Org



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | Buy Viagra | MarketAmerica.com |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | DaytonaCPA.com | Take Your Blog to a Higher Level
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.