From foodconsumer.org
Calcium Requirements May Be Overestimated
By Rosalie Marion Bliss
Dec 6, 2007 - 8:42:38 PM
People
who want healthy bones have long been told to get plenty of calcium.
After all, the body compensates for an inadequate calcium intake by
drawing calcium out of bones and putting it into the blood stream. Now,
Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists have reported study
findings that suggest calcium's current recommended amount, called
"adequate intake" or AI, for American adults aged 19 or older may be
greater than necessary.
The study was led by ARS biologist
Curtiss Hunt with statistician LuAnn Johnson, both based at the
agency's Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center (GRHNRC) in Grand
Forks, ND. Hunt is trying to fill in knowledge gaps about calcium's
estimated average requirement for adults. Today's AI for calcium is
1,000 mg per day for those aged 19 to 50 years, and 1,200 mg per day
for those aged 51 or older.
The findings were published recently
in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. ARS is the U.S.
Department of Agriculture's chief scientific research agency.
The
body's skeleton needs adequate dietary calcium to reach its full
potential in terms of bone mass. Yet calcium alone does not protect
against bone loss, especially during menopause.
The researchers
analyzed data collected from 155 male and female volunteers, aged 19 to
75 years, who participated in at least one in a series of 19 controlled
feeding studies conducted at the GFHNRC. The modeling of those data
suggests that the average amount of dietary calcium needed to maintain
a neutral calcium balance is about 741 mg per day. Calcium balance is
the condition wherein the amount of calcium consumed equals the amount
of calcium lost through elimination.
The body tries to maintain
a relatively stable amount of calcium within a broad range of typical
daily calcium intakes fed to volunteers--415 mg on the low end to 1,740
mg on the high end. When fed the lower amounts, for example, the body
was more efficient in keeping calcium. When fed the higher amounts, the
extra calcium was simply eliminated.
The work is of interest to
researchers and to nutrition experts who update nutrient intake
recommendations for must-have nutrients.
______________________________
ARS News Service
Agricultural Research Service, USDA
Rosalie Marion Bliss, (301) 504-4318, rosalie.bliss@ars.usda.gov
December 6, 2007
--View this report online, plus photos and related stories, at www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr
______________________________
_____________