Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Foodconsumer & Others


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards


Diet & Health : Nutrition Last Updated: May 5, 2009 - 12:58:27 PM


Organic tomatoes contain higher nutrients than conventional tomatoes
By David Liu
Jul 7, 2007 - 10:53:19 AM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   

Credit of photo: nt.gov.au

Organically grown tomatoes may be more valuable than those grown conventionally as they contain higher levels of beneficial compounds, according to a new study published in the journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

 

Organic crops are widely viewed as nutritionally superior to their counterparts grown conventionally.   Not every one believes in organic food, but studies have indeed found more nutrients in organic tomatoes and other plant foods.

 

In the study, Alyson Mitchell from the University of California-Davis, and researchers from University of Minnesota tested two naturally occurring antioxidants quercetin and kaempferol aglycones in dried tomato samples grown and processed conventionally or organically between 1994 and 2004.

 

Ten-year mean levels of quercetin and kaempferol in organic tomatoes (115.5 and 63.3 mg per gram of dry matter) were 79 and 97% higher than those in conventional tomatoes (64.6 and 32.06 mg per gram of dry matter), the study found.

 

In addition, the levels of flavonoids increased over time in samples from organic treatments, but in the samples conventionally grown. These compounds increased as soil organic matter accumulation increased in organic plots and manure application rates decreased.

 

Mitchell's group also reported in 2006 in the same journal that "Significantly higher levels of percent soluble solids (17%), quercetin (30%), kaempferol (17%), and ascorbic acid (26%) were found in Burbank tomatoes (fresh weight basis; FWB), whereas only levels of percent soluble solids (10%) and kaempferol (20%) were significantly higher in organic Ropreco tomatoes (FWB)."

 

The superiority of organic tomatoes was also reported in the October 2004 issue of the journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry by Caris-Veyrat C and colleagues in France.   The researchers found that fresh organic tomatoes contained higher vitamin C, carotenoids, and polyphenol contents (except for chlorogenic acid) than conventional tomatoes.

.

Primary source:
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, June 2007
"Ten-Year Comparison of the Influence of Organic and Conventional Crop Management Practices on the Content of Flavonoids in Tomatoes"
A.E. Mitchell, Y.-J. Hong, E. Koh, D.M. Barrett, D. E. Bryant, R.F. Denison, and S. Kaffka





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












We have moved to Food Consumer . Org



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | Buy Viagra | MarketAmerica.com |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | DaytonaCPA.com | Take Your Blog to a Higher Level
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.