HIV Prevention Education and HIV-Related Policies in Secondary Schools
--- Selected Sites, United States, 2006
Persons who engage in sexual risk behaviors are at increased risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
School health education can help reduce the prevalence of sexual risk behaviors among students
(
1).
In addition, school health policies can help protect the rights and
health of HIV-infected students and staff members and reduce the
likelihood of transmitting HIV infection to others (
2). To determine the
prevalence and extent of HIV prevention education and the prevalence of
HIV infection policies among public secondary schools,* CDC analyzed
data from the 2006 School Health Profiles for schools in 36 states and
13 large urban school districts. The results of that analysis indicated
that, in 2006, the majority of secondary schools included HIV
prevention in a required health education course (state median: 84.2%;
district median: 57.2%); however, few secondary schools (state median:
21.1%; district median: 28.5%) taught all 11 topics listed in the
questionnaire related to HIV prevention. Approximately half of schools
(state median: 51.6%; district median: 48.3%) had a policy regarding
students or staff members with HIV infection or acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). To help reduce HIV-related risk
behavior and protect the rights and health of HIV-infected students and
staff members, schools should increase efforts to teach all HIV
prevention topics and implement policies regarding students or staff
members with HIV infection.
School Health Profiles surveys have been conducted biennially since 1994 to assess school health programs
(
3).
States and large school districts participate in the surveys, selecting
either all public secondary schools within their jurisdictions or
systematic, equal-probability, representative samples of schools.† At each school, the principal and lead health
education teacher are sent questionnaires to be self-administered and
returned to the state or local agency conducting the survey.
Participation in School Health Profiles is confidential and voluntary.
In 2006, lead health education teachers were asked questions regarding
the content of required health education courses and staff development
on health education topics. Principals were asked questions regarding
policies on students or staff members with HIV infection or AIDS.
Follow-up telephone calls and written reminders were used to encourage
participation. Data from each questionnaire were cleaned and edited by
CDC. Those surveys that used a representative sample of schools, had
appropriate documentation, and achieved a response rate of 70% or
higher were weighted to reflect the likelihood of schools being
selected and to adjust for differing patterns of nonresponse. For the
2006 School Health Profiles survey, lead health education teachers were
asked the following questions: 1) "During this school year, have
teachers in this school tried to increase student knowledge on each of
the following topics in a required health education course in any of
grades 6 through 12?" Respondents were asked to indicate yes or no on a
list of topics that included "HIV prevention." 2) "During this school
year, did teachers in this school teach each of the following
pregnancy, HIV, or sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention topics
in a required health education course for students in any of grades 6
through 12?" The following 11 topics were listed: abstinence as the
most effective method to avoid pregnancy, HIV, and STDs; how to
correctly use a condom; condom efficacy; risks associated with having
multiple sexual partners; social or cultural influences on sexual
behavior; how to prevent HIV infection; how HIV is transmitted; how HIV
affects the human body; influence of alcohol and other drugs on
HIV-related risk behaviors; how to find valid information or services
related to HIV or HIV testing; and compassion for persons living with
HIV or AIDS. 3) "During the past 2 years, did you receive staff
development (such as workshops, conferences, continuing education, or
any other kind of in-service) on each of the following health education
topics?" Respondents were asked to indicate yes or no on a list of
topics that included "HIV prevention." Principals were asked the
following question: "Has this school adopted a policy on students
and/or staff who have HIV infection or AIDS?"
In 2006, 34 states and 13 large urban school
districts§ met the criteria for both their principal and lead health
education teacher surveys to be weighted and two
states¶
met the criteria for the principal survey only. Among states, the
number of lead health education teachers who participated ranged from
68 to 659 (median: 250), and response rates ranged from 70% to 91%
(median: 77%); among school districts, the number of lead health
education teachers ranged from 32 to 212 (median: 56), and response
rates ranged from 70% to 100% (median: 79%). Among states, the number
of principals who participated ranged from 68 to 661 (median: 262), and
response rates ranged from 70% to 91% (median: 78%); among school
districts, the number of principals ranged from 31 to 234 (median: 55),
and response rates ranged from 71% to 98% (median: 79%). Only 21 states
and eight large urban school districts that obtained weighted data in
both 1996 and 2006 were included in comparisons of data for those 2
years. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, a nonparametric analogue to a
two-sample t-test, was used to test for differences across states and
school districts. Differences were considered statistically significant
at p<0.05.
The percentage of secondary schools that taught HIV prevention in a required health education course ranged from
35.6% to 99.3% (median: 84.2%) among states, and from 0.0% to 100.0% (median: 57.2%) among school districts
(Table 1). The percentage of schools that taught all 11 HIV prevention topics ranged from 1.0% to 53.1% (median: 21.1%) among
states and from 0.0% to 66.5% (median: 28.5%) among school districts. The percentage of secondary schools that taught how
to correctly use a condom ranged from 1.0% to 59.1% (median: 24.3%) among states and from 0.0% to 74.8%
(median: 33.7%) among school districts. The percentage that taught about condom efficacy ranged from 11.7% to 90.0%
(median: 56.0%) among states and from 0.0% to 91.1% (median: 56.0%) among school
districts.
For the other nine HIV
prevention topics the median percentage of secondary schools that taught each in a required health education course ranged from
64.1% (how to find valid information or services related to HIV or HIV testing) to 78.7% (how HIV is transmitted) among
states and from 50.0% (social or cultural influences on sexual behavior) to 57.2% (six different topics) among school districts.
The percentage of secondary schools in which the lead health education teacher received staff development on
HIV prevention during the 2 years preceding the survey ranged from 21.3% to 63.9% (median: 43.7%) among states and
from 42.9% to 100.0% (median: 65.6%) among school districts (Table 1). The percentage of secondary schools with a
policy regarding students or staff members with HIV infection or AIDS ranged from 27.0% to 89.5% (median: 51.6%)
among states and from 28.1% to 100.0% (median: 48.3%) among school districts
(Table 2).
The median percentage of schools with such a policy decreased from
71.9% in 1996 to 52.9% in 2006 among states and from 86.2% to 49.2%
among school districts, when analysis was limited to comparing results
from the same 21 states and eight school districts in each year.
Reported by:
A Balaji, PhD, N Brener, PhD, L Kann, PhD, L Romero, DrPH, H Wechsler, EdD, Div of Adolescent and School
Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Editorial Note:
The findings in this report indicate that, in 2006, the majority of secondary schools in 34 states and 13
school districts provided some education on HIV prevention topics in required health education courses. However, more than
half the states that conducted surveys reported that less than one fourth of their schools taught all 11 HIV prevention topics
listed in the questionnaire; more than half the school districts that conducted surveys reported that less than one third of
their schools taught all 11 topics. Health education can increase knowledge and skills regarding how to avoid HIV infection
(
4).
This analysis also indicated that a median of less than 50% of lead health education teachers among states and a median
of approximately two thirds among school districts had received staff development on HIV prevention. Staff development
on health topics is critical for effective teaching
(
5).
The finding that in approximately half of the states and school districts conducting surveys, less than 50% of
secondary schools had a policy on students or staff members with HIV infection or AIDS is consistent with previously reported
national data (
6).
In addition, the median percentage of schools with such a policy has
decreased since 1996. Reasons for these decreases warrant further
investigation. Policies for addressing HIV infection in the school
setting can provide guidance, support, and protection to those who are
infected and to other students and staff members, families, and
community members. These groups, along with public health and legal
professionals, should work together to develop and implement
HIV-related policies and continually assess them, based on new
legislation, scientific data, and real-world experience (
2).
The findings in this report are subject to at least three
limitations. First, these data apply only to public secondary schools
and, therefore, do not reflect practices at private schools or
elementary schools. Second, these data were self-reported by principals
and lead health education teachers and were not verified by other
sources. Finally, these data were collected during spring and fall 2006
and do not reflect any state, district, or school policies enacted,
modified, or discontinued since then.
Despite limitations, School Health Profiles remains an
important tool for states and school districts to monitor the
current status of HIV prevention education and HIV-related policies. These data can be used by public health and education
agencies to assist schools in improving their HIV prevention curricula and HIV-related policies.
Acknowledgments
The findings in this report are based on data collected by state and local School Health Profiles coordinators.
References
-
Kirby D, Laris BA, Rolleri L. Sex and HIV education
programs for youth: their impact and important characteristics. Scotts
Valley, CA: ETR Associates; 2006. Available at http://www.etr.org/recapp/programs/SexHIVedProgs.pdf.
-
National Association of State Boards of
Education.
Someone at school has AIDS: a complete guide to education policies concerning HIV
infection,
2001.
Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Boards of
Education.
Available at
http://www.nasbe.org/index.php/component/content/article/78-model-policies/120-policies-concerning-students-and-staff-with-hiv-infection.
-
Balaji AB, Brener ND, McManus T, Hawkins J, Kann L, Speicher N.
School Health Profiles: characteristics of health programs among
secondary schools 2006. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human
Services, CDC; 2008. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/profiles/pdf/profiles_2006.pdf.
-
Johnson BT, Carey MP, Marsh KL, Levin KD, Scott-Sheldon LA.
Interventions to reduce sexual risk for the human immunodeficiency
virus in adolescents, 1985--2000: a research synthesis. Arch Pediatr
Adolesc Med 2003;157:381--8.
-
Jones SE, Brener ND, McManus T. The relationship between staff
development and health instruction in schools in the United States. Am
J Health Educ 2004;35:2--10.
-
Brener ND, Wheeler L, Wolfe LC, Vernon-Smiley M, Caldart-Olson L.
Health services: results from the School Health Policies and Programs
Study 2006. J Sch Health 2007;77:464--85.
* Middle, junior high, and senior high schools with one or more of grades 6--12.
† In the 2006 survey, statewide
samples were representative of all public secondary schools in the
state with two exceptions: no schools from the New York City Department
of Education were included in the New York state sample, and no schools
from the Chicago Public Schools were included in the Illinois sample.
§
States: Alabama, Alaska,
Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii,
Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi,
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina,
North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota,
Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia.
School districts: Charlotte-Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina; Chicago, Illinois; Dallas, Texas; District of Columbia;
Hillsborough County, Florida; Los Angeles, California; Memphis,
Tennessee; Miami-Dade County, Florida; Orange County, Florida; Palm
Beach County, Florida; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; San Diego,
California; and San Francisco, California.
¶ Illinois and Washington.
Table 1

Return to top.
Table 2

Trends in HIV- and STD-Related Risk Behaviors Among High
School Students --- United States, 1991--2007
Persons who engage in unprotected sexual intercourse or use injection drugs are at increased risk for
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Changes in HIV- and STD-related
risk behaviors among high school students in the United States during 1991--2005 were reported previously
(
1). To update these analyses through 2007, CDC analyzed data from nine biennial
national Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (YRBS). This
report summarizes the results of that analysis, which indicated that, during 1991--2007, the percentage of U.S. high school
students who ever had sexual intercourse decreased 12%, the percentage who had sexual intercourse with four or more persons
during their lifetime decreased 20%, and the percentage who were currently sexually active decreased 7%. Among students who
were currently sexually active, the prevalence of condom use increased 33%. However, these changes in risk behaviors were
not observed in some subgroups. In addition, no changes were detected in the prevalence of sexual risk
behaviors from 2005 to 2007, and many students still
engaged in behaviors that place them at risk for HIV infection and STDs. Additional efforts
to reduce sexual risk behaviors, particularly among black, Hispanic, and male students, must be implemented to meet
the
Healthy People 2010 national health objective for adolescent sexual behaviors
(objective no. 25-11) (
2) and to decrease rates
of HIV infection and STDs.
The biennial national YRBS, a component of CDC's Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, used independent,
three-stage cluster samples for the 1991--2007 surveys to obtain cross-sectional data representative of public and private
school students in grades 9--12 in all 50 states and the District of Columbia
(
3). Sample sizes ranged from 10,904 to 16,296.
School response rates ranged from 70% to 81%, and student response rates ranged from 83% to 90%; therefore, overall
response rates for the surveys ranged from 60% to 70%.
For each cross-sectional national survey, students completed
anonymous, self-administered questionnaires that included identically
worded questions about sexual intercourse, number of sex partners,
condom use, and injection-drug use.* Sexual experience was defined as
ever having had sexual intercourse. Multiple sex partners was defined
as having four or more sex partners during one's lifetime. Current
sexual activity was defined as having sexual intercourse during the 3
months before the survey. Condom use was defined as use of a condom
during last sexual intercourse among currently sexually active
students. Injection-drug use was defined as ever having used a needle
to inject any illegal drug into one's body. Race/ethnicity data are
presented only for non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white, and Hispanic
students (who might be of any race); the numbers of students from other
racial/ethnic groups were too small for meaningful analysis.
Data were weighted to provide national estimates
(
3), and the statistical software used for all data analyses accounted for
the complex sample design. Temporal changes were analyzed using logistic regression analyses, which controlled for sex,
race/ethnicity, and grade and simultaneously assessed significant (p<0.05) linear and quadratic time
effects.† T-test analyses were used to test for significant (p<0.05) differences between results from 2005 and 2007.
During 1991--2007, the prevalence of sexual experience decreased 12% overall, from 54.1% to 47.8%.
Logistic regression analyses indicated a significant linear decrease overall and among female, male, 9th-grade, 10th-grade,
11th-grade, 12th-grade, black, and white students
(Table). Among Hispanic students, no significant change was detected. Among
male students, 11th-grade students, and black students, a significant quadratic trend also was detected. Among male students
and 11th-grade students, the prevalence of sexual experience declined during 1991--1997 and then leveled off during
1997--2007. Among black students, the prevalence of sexual experience declined during 1991--2001 and then leveled off during
2001--2007. From 2005 to 2007, no significant change was detected in the prevalence of sexual experience overall or among any
sex, grade, or racial/ethnic subgroup of students.
During 1991--2007, the prevalence of multiple sex partners decreased 20%, from 18.7% to 14.9%. A significant
linear decrease was detected overall and among female, male, 9th-grade, 10th-grade, 11th-grade, 12th-grade, black, and
white students (Table). Among Hispanic students, no significant change was detected. A significant quadratic trend also
was detected among male students, 11th-grade students, and 12th-grade students. For each group, the prevalence of multiple
sex partners declined during 1991--1997 and then leveled off during 1997--2007. From 2005 to 2007, no significant change
was detected in the prevalence of multiple sex partners overall or among any sex, grade, or racial/ethnic
subgroup of students.
During 1991--2007, the prevalence of current sexual activity decreased 7%, from 37.5% to 35.0%. A significant
linear decrease was detected overall and among 9th-grade students and black students (Table).
Among 9th-grade and 11th-grade students, a significant quadratic trend
was detected. For 9th-grade students, the prevalence of current sexual
activity remained stable during 1991--1999 and then declined during
1999--2007. For 11th-grade students, the prevalence of current sexual
activity declined during 1991--1999 and then remained stable during
1999--2007. From 2005 to 2007, no significant change was detected in
the prevalence of current sexual activity overall or among any sex,
grade, or racial/ethnic subgroup of students.
During 1991--2007, among students who were currently sexually active, the prevalence of condom use increased 33%,
from 46.2% to 61.5%. A significant linear increase in condom use was detected among currently sexually active students overall
and among all sex, grade, and racial/ethnic subgroups of students who were currently sexually active. A significant quadratic
trend also was detected among currently sexually active students overall and among female students, 10th-grade students, and
black students who were currently sexually active. Among currently sexually active students overall, female students, and
10th-grade students, the prevalence of condom use increased during 1991--2003 and then leveled off during 2003--2007. The
prevalence of condom use among currently sexually active black students increased during 1991--1999 and then leveled off during
1999--2007. From 2005 to 2007, no significant change was detected in the prevalence of condom use overall or among any
sex, grade, or racial/ethnic subgroup of currently sexually active students.
During 1995--2007, the prevalence of injection-drug use remained below 4%. However, a significant linear increase
in injection-drug use was detected among black and Hispanic students. From 2005 to 2007, no change was detected in
the prevalence of injection-drug use overall or among any subgroup, except for 10th-grade students, whose prevalence
decreased from 2.3% to 1.4%.
Reported by:
A Balaji, PhD, R Lowry, MD, N Brener, PhD, L Kann, PhD, L Romero, DrPH, H Wechsler, EdD, Div of Adolescent and
School Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Editorial Note:
A
Healthy People 2010 national health objective (no. 25-11) is to increase to 95% the proportion
of adolescents in grades 9--12 who abstain from sexual intercourse or use condoms if currently sexually active
(
2).
CDC reported previously that, in 2007, 87% of high school students
reported abstaining from sexual intercourse or using condoms if
currently sexually active (
4),
compared with 80% in 1991. Despite this progress, the analyses in this
report indicate that no changes were detected in the prevalence of
sexual risk behaviors from 2005 to 2007, and some subgroups did not
experience the overall changes observed during 1991--2007. For example,
among black students, the prevalence of sexual experience, multiple sex
partners, and current sexual activity remained higher than among any
other subgroup of high school students, the prevalence of sexual
experience did not decrease during 2001--2007, and the prevalence of
condom use did not increase during 1999--2007. Among Hispanic students,
the prevalence of sexual experience, multiple sex partners, and current
sexual activity did not change during 1991--2007. Among male students,
the prevalence of sexual experience and multiple sex partners did not
decrease after 1997, and current sexual activity did not change during
1991--2007. Therefore, renewed efforts to delay onset of sexual
activity and increase condom use among students who are sexually active
are warranted, especially among black, Hispanic, and male students.
The findings in this report are subject to at least two
limitations. First, these data apply only to youths who attend school
and therefore are not representative of all persons in this age group.
In 2005, of persons aged 16--17 years in the United States,
approximately 3% were not enrolled in a high school program and had not
completed high school (
5). Second, the extent of underreporting or overreporting of
behaviors cannot be determined, although the survey questions
demonstrated good test-retest reliability (
6).
The lack of recent change in the prevalence of HIV- and STD-related risk behaviors among high school students might
have contributed to recent increases in related health outcomes. For example, during 2003--2006, in the 33 states with
confidential, name-based HIV infection reporting, the estimated annual number of HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
cases diagnosed among adolescents aged 15--19 increased 34%, from 993 in 2003 to 1,332 in 2006
(
7).
Similarly, after decreasing annually since 1999, gonorrhea infection
rates among adolescents aged 15--19 years increased 2% from 2004 to
2005, from 421.9 to 431.8 per 100,000, and then increased 6% from 2005
to 2006, from 431.8 to 458.8 per 100,000 (
8). Also, birth rates among adolescents aged 15--19 years
decreased annually during 1991--2005 and then increased for the
first time during 2005--2006, from 40.5 live births per 1,000 females in 2005 to 41.9 in 2006
(
9).
Programs and activities aimed at addressing these health outcomes
should involve parents and families, schools, youth-serving
organizations, health-care providers, the media, government agencies,
and youths themselves.
References
-
CDC. Trends in HIV-related risk behaviors among high school
students---United States, 1991--2005. MMWR 2006;55:851--4.
-
US
Department of Health and Human Services. Sexually transmitted diseases;
25-11: increase the proportion of adolescents who abstain from sexual
intercourse or use condoms if currently sexually active. In: Healthy
people 2010: understanding and improving health. 2nd ed. Washington,
DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000. Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/html/volume2/25stds.htm#_toc489706328.
-
CDC. Methodology of the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. MMWR 2004;53(No. RR-12).
-
CDC. Youth risk behavior surveillance---United States, 2007. MMWR 2008;57(No. SS-4):130.
-
Laird J, DeBell M, Kienzl G, Chapman C. Dropout rates in the United States: 2005. Washington, DC: US Department of Education,
National Center for Education Statistics; 2007. Available at
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007059.
-
Brener
ND, Kann L, McManus T, Kinchen SA, Sundberg EC, Ross JG. Reliability of
the 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Survey questionnaire. J Adolesc Health
2002;31:336--42.
-
CDC. Cases of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States and
dependent areas, 2006. HIV/AIDS surveillance report, volume 18.
Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2008:11. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/2006report.
-
CDC.
Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2006. Atlanta, GA: US
Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2007. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/toc2006.htm.
-
Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;56(7). Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr56/nvsr56_07.pdf.
* The YRBS questions were as follows: "Have you ever had
sexual intercourse?" "During your life, with how many people have you
had sexual intercourse?" "During the past 3 months, with how many
people did you have sexual intercourse?" "The last time you had sexual
intercourse, did you or your partner use a condom?" and "During your
life, how many times have you used a needle to inject any illegal drug
into your body?" The wording of the question on injection-drug use
changed substantially after the 1993 survey, so 1991 and 1993 data on
injection-drug use are not included in this report.
† A quadratic trend indicates a significant but
nonlinear trend in the data over time; whereas a linear trend is
depicted with a straight line, a quadratic trend is depicted with a
curve with one bend. Trends that include significant quadratic and
linear components demonstrate nonlinear variation in addition to an
overall increase or decrease over time.
Table

QuickStats: Age-Adjusted Death* Rates for Human Immunodeficiency
Virus (HIV) Disease, by Race and Sex --- United States,
1987--2006†
* Per 100,000 U.S. standard population.
† Data for 2006 are preliminary.
§ In 1987, a new category for HIV infection was added to the
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth
Revision (ICD-9). In 1999, ICD-10 took effect, resulting in additional deaths classified into the
HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome category; therefore, death rates for
1987--1998 are not comparable with those computed after 1998.
The age-adjusted death rate for HIV disease declined by 6.7% for black males and 5.6% for white males
from 2005 to 2006. The rate did not change for black females, but the low rate for white females further declined
by 12.5% to 0.7 per 100,000 in 2006. After a period of steady increase from 1987 to 1995, HIV disease
mortality peaked for white males in 1994, for white females in 1995, and for black males and females in 1995.
Subsequently, the death rate for HIV disease decreased an average of 30.5% per year for the white population and 26.3%
for the black population through 1998, with smaller decreases noted through 2006.
SOURCE: Heron MP, Hoyert DL, Xu JQ, Scott C, Tejada-Vera B. Deaths: preliminary data for 2006. Natl
Vital Stat Rep 2008;56(16). Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr56/nvsr56_16.pdf and
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/hist001r.pdf.
|
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are
provided as a service to
MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply
endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content
of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in
MMWR were current as of
the date of publication. |
All
MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from typeset documents.
This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version.
Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr)
and/or the original
MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.
An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371;
telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.
**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to
mmwrq@cdc.gov.
Date last reviewed: 7/30/2008