Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Foodconsumer & Others


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards


Misc. News : Letter to Editor Last Updated: Apr 20, 2011 - 9:38:09 AM


Reader's comment on Calcium, Vitamin D Supplements of Questionable Benefit
By Mark P.
Feb 26, 2007 - 7:10:09 AM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   

Sirs,

The article: Calicium, Vitamin D Supplements of Questionable Benefit,    most be some kind of a joke.  Calcium is not even spelled correctly.  Researchers are saying that the human body uses 3000 to 5000 IU of vitamin D per day(Heaney, et. Al Creighton U).  To tell a person that vitamin D has no benefit is like telling a person that is drinking only 10oz of water per day will not prevent dehydration.  It is correct, but you have not told the whole truth.  Who paid you to write this article?

I have been taking 5000 IU per day for two years and my vertebral discs have healed and I have avoided back surgery.  I have actually grown two inches taller than I have ever been.  My PCP tells me I have the health of a 25 year old and that is not bad for a 55 year old man.  You guys are just pharm animals at the will of the pharma.

Mark P.

Greensboro , NC  



Editor's note:

Thank Mark for his comment.  The article in question
Calcium, Vitamin D Supplements of Questionable Benefit was written by a staff writer of VOA News, a U.S. government media outlet.

Our opinion is that the study results may not be faulty. But the interpretation is misleading.  In the study, subjects were asked to take supplements of 1,000 milligrams of calcium with 400 international units of vitamin D. There is nothing wrong with that.  But the conclusion that calcium and vitamin D can't improve cardiovascular health can be problematic as the researchers did not study other doses and their effects remain virtually unknown.

We agree that the effect of vitamin D and or calcium like all other nutrients or even drugs depends on the dose.   For instance, vitamin C is said to have no protective effect against colds, as shown in many studies. But often times the dose used in such studies is ridiculously low. 

As for vitamin D, the most authoritative experts who have done research for many years on the vitamin have already challenged the current recommended daily allowance.  They suggest that the RDA should be raised to at least 2000 IU per day from 200 IU for adults under 51 and 400 IU for adults above 50.

Readers are advised to exercise caution whenever they read an article on some health issue.  The majority of studies are sponsored by the industry or the government for a purpose which is often business or commerce-related.  Errors, mistakes, biases, misinformation and or falsification are inevitable as early survey reports show.   To prevent yourself from being misled, you’d better read widely and think deeply.









© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












We have moved to Food Consumer . Org



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | Buy Viagra | MarketAmerica.com |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | DaytonaCPA.com | Take Your Blog to a Higher Level
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.