Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

General Health : Government Last Updated: Oct 15, 2008 - 6:10:51 AM


Private insurance in Medicare costs the government more
By Ben Wasserman
Jun 30, 2008 - 10:48:42 AM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   

MONDAY June 30, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- Health officials announced Friday that the Department of Health and Human Services will lock the current pricing system to prevent the planned 10.6 percent cut in Medicare payments to physicians who treat certain Medicare patients under a private program.

The cut was scheduled on Tuesday. The decision came after the Senate could not reach a deal on Friday and Congress is ready for a midsummer break this week and will not pick up the issue again until after this week.

The cut would reduce the government's payment to these insurers by $14 billion over a five-year period while a conservative Republican caucus estimated that the reduction would be as much as 47.5 billion over 11 years.

The cut would affect the Special Needs Plan Alliance; a program involves some 30 private insurers and is used by 1.1 million people. Medicare covers about 45 million seniors.

The payment cuts to doctors are part of a 1997 budget-balancing deal. Democrats said the private insurers are too costly.   And studies show that private issuers receive more money from the government while offering less medical service.  

Bush administration threatened to veto any legislation that would result in the cut in payments to private issuers arguing that the payment cut will affect those who are covered by the program, media reported.

Doctors argued through their trade organizations like the American Medical Association, and the AARP that the payment cut would promote doctors to leave the patients under the Medicare Advantage untreated.

On Friday, the debate between Republicans and Democrats in the Senate were fairly tense and ended up with democrats having one vote short of 60 that is needed to pass their version of the Medicare fix.

The Senate Finance Committee was reportedly close to working out a compromise without cutting payments to private insurers in that program in hopes that the bill could avoid the president’s veto.

But the possible deal worked out by the Senate Finance Committee did not go anywhere as Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) decided to push ahead with the House bill which has a good chance to circumvent Bush’s veto, Washington Post reported.

The House on Tuesday passed a veto-proof bill 355 to 59 to delay the planned 10.6% cut in the Medicare fees to physicians who treat patients under the Medicare Advantage for 18 months, but slash the payments to about 30 private issuers participating in the Special Need Alliance Program such as Humana Inc., United Health Group and Aetna Inc.

According to insdebayarea.com, payments to Medicare private insurers for Medicare Advantage plans cost the government 13 percent more than traditional Medicare.  A new study by the General Accounting Office showed the private insurers in 2005 spent less on medical services for beneficiaries and earned larger profits than projected, the Los Angeles Times reported.





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












Do you know vitamin C lowers blood pressure?

disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | abou t us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | Buy a home | DaytonaCPA.com |
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.