Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

General Health : Government Last Updated: Jun 30, 2008 - 11:14:37 AM


FDA: Glaxo holds studies on Avandia
By Sue Mueller
Apr 8, 2008 - 1:55:49 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
TUESDAY April 8, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- GlaxoSmithKline Plc failed to report all the required studies on its diabetes drug Avandia to the Food and Drug Administration, the agency said in a warning letter released on Tuesday.

Avandia was linked to increased risk of heart attack and a black box warning, the highest level of warning, was required on the label in November.

The company said at the time the FDA made its decision, the agency had received all the data.

In the letter dated March 25 and posted on the agency's website on Tuesday, the FDA said an inspection from August through November 2007 revealed Glaxo did not list a number of post-approval studies of Avandia as required.

"The specific violations in this letter are serious and may be symptomatic of underlying post marketing safety reporting failures," the FDA was cited as saying in the letter.

Nancy Pekarek, GlaxoSmithKline spokeswoman, said the omissions were unintentional and the missing data did not raise any new safety concerns about the diabetes drug Avandia.

According to the FDA, nine studies were not disclosed until September 2007. Also 11 other studies were not included in required annual reports although they were given to the agency in other ways.

The missing data, the company was cited as saying, included the start, progress and final data from some trials. But the omissions "did not interfere with the timely reporting of adverse event information to the FDA", Glaxo Chief Medical Officer Ronald Krall said.

The FDA required a black box warning for Avandia because the medicine may increase the risk of heart attack.





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites














disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | abou t us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | beyondcreditcards.com | DaytonaCPA.com
Get Google Ads Free | Download Movies | Search Public Records | Stock Trading Robot
Satellite for PC | Let Your Car Burn Water | The Affiliate Conspiracy | Run a Car on Water
Top Movie Downloads | Reverse Phone Detective | Get Paid for Surveys | Fat Loss 4 Idiots

© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.