SATURDAY July 26, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- The State of California on Friday
became the first state to ban the use of artificial trans fat, long linked to
clogging of arteries, in all restaurants and other food establishments in the
state.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that prohibits restaurants from using
trans fat in any form of fat including oil, margarine and shortening. The bill
AB97 was introduced by Assembly member Tony Mendoza (D-Norwalk).
Under the new law, the use of trans fat in all California restaurants will be
phased out by Jan 1, 2010 in all foods except for baked foods which will be free
of trans fat by Jan 1, 2011.
The law does not apply to school cafeteria. California has already banned
serving foods with added trans fat in schools.
"California is a leader in promoting health and nutrition and I am pleased
to continue that tradition by being the first state in the nation to phase out
trans fat," Gov. Schwarzenegger said. "Consuming trans fat is linked
to coronary heart disease and today we are taking a strong step toward creating
a healthier future for California."
Trans fat, also known as partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, is manufactured
by adding hydrogen chemically to unsaturated fat at high temperature in a
process called partial hydrogenation.
Consumption of trans fat has been linked to the development
of coronary heart disease and stroke as well as other chronic disease such as type
2 diabetes and possibly cancer. Trans fat is involved in about 100,000 deaths
from heart disease each year in the United States, according to Harvard
epidemiologists and nutritionists.
The New York Times cited Dr, Clyde Yancy, incoming president of the American
Heart Association as saying a 2 percent increase in trans fat intake could
result in a 25 percent increase in the risk of developing coronary artery
disease over time.
Yancy was quoted by the times as saying “It is pretty clear
now that it was a mistake for us to embrace these fats.”
But the American Heart Association in 2006 opposed
a proposal to ban use of trans fat in the New York City’s eateries, according
to newstarget.com. The AHA argued that banning trans fat would
prompt restaurants to use other saturated fat, which is known to increase bad cholesterol.
But Michael
Jacobson, executive director of Center
for Science in the Public Interest, a Washington-based health advocacy
group, was quoted by Washington Post as saying "All the evidence shows is
that trans fats are the most harmful. You can substitute anything in their
place, and it will be an improvement."
The new California law specifies that violations result in
fines ranging from $25 to $1,000. But the bill allows packaged foods with less
than 0.5 grams per serving of trans fat.
A health observer affiliated with foodconsumer.org cautioned
that there is no safe threshold for trans fat and any amount of this chemical
could add up to increase health risk.
New York City, Philadelphia, Seattle and Montgomery County, MD have already
banned trans fat, but California is the first state to prohibit use of trans
fat in restaurants statewide, Amy Wintefled from the National Conference of
State Legislatures was cited by the Associated Press as saying.
The California Restaurant Association opposed the bill, but spokesman Daniel
Conway was cited by the AP as saying that his organization will not challenge
the bill because many of its members have started phasing out trans fat.
According to the New York Times, many national restaurant chains including
Kentucky Fried Chicken, Wendy's, Taco Bell, the Cheesecake Factory and McDonald
have begun to use alternative fat in the foods they serve.
Average daily intake of trans fat for an American is 5.8
grams or 2.6 percent of calories.
Major
food sources of trans fat for American adults include cakes, cookies, crackers,
pies, bread (40%), animal products (21%), margarine (17%), fried potatoes (8%),
potato chips, corn chips, popcorn (5%), household shortening (4%), salad
dressing (3%), breakfast cereal and candy (1%), the Food and Drug
Administration reported in 2005.
Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only.
The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals.
Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.