SUNDAY July 20, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- As of Saturday,
New York City health inspectors can issue citations to fine restaurants that do
not comply with the city's calorie posting rule.
The fine ranges from $200 to $2,000.
The rule requires restaurants that have 15 or more outlets nationwide to pose calorie information alongside their prices and affects
more than 2,000 restaurants or 10 percent of the total in the city.
As of July 12, 277 restaurants had been cited for their failure
to comply, according to the New York Times. Inspectors have had the authority
to cite eateries since May.
The rule has been planned to take effect in April, but delayed
because New York State fought against the rule in court.
In the end, a high court sided with the city
and upheld the regulation.
Reuters cited an analyst as saying that the calorie posting
rule would not help those who eat at restaurants like McDonalds suggesting that
people who care about what they eat may not go there for a lunch in the first
place.
A health observer affiliated with foodconsumer.org suggested
that counting calories is not the right way for people to maintain a healthy
weight because few people could keep counting calories for a lifetime.
The key to fighting obesity is to eat the right foods,
according to Dr. Colin T. Campbell, a distinguished nutrition professor retired
from Cornell University.
He suggested that animal-based foods are the likely culprit
for the obesity epidemic.
And he said
those who use a whole foods, plant based diet do not have count calories.
They can eat whatever amounts without getting
excess weight.
In New York City, another rule has taken effect this month. Starting
on July 1, the city requires restaurants to clear artificial trans fat from all
their menu items.
According to the rule, all foods served, including baked
goods, oils, shortenings and margarines used for baking, and pre-prepared items
that contain artificial trans fat, must contain no more than 0.5 grams of trans
fat per serving.
But foods served in the manufacturer’s original, sealed
packaging, such as candy and crackers, are still exempt regardless of the
amount of trans fat in the foods.
Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only.
The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals.
Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.