Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

Food & Health : Laws & Politics Last Updated: Aug 1, 2008 - 10:24:18 AM


FDA expands feed ban to reduce mad cow disease risk
By Sue Mueller
Apr 24, 2008 - 10:53:07 AM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
TURSDAY April 24, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- To further reduce the risk of mad cow disease in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration on WEDNESDAY released a new rule to prohibit certain cattle materials from use in all animal food including pet food, which will appear on Friday April 28 in Federal Register.

The rule was proposed on Oct. 6, 2005.  And the FDA has received more than 840 comments.  The prohibited risk materials specified in the final rule include the following:

--- The entire carcass of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)-positive cattle;
--- The brains and spinal cords from cattle 30 months of age and older;
--- The entire carcass of cattle not inspected and passed for human consumption that are 30 months of age or older from which brains and spinal cords were not removed;
--- Tallow that is derived from BSE-positive cattle;
--- Tallow that is derived from other materials prohibited by this rule that contains more than 0.15 percent insoluble impurities;
--- Mechanically separated beef that is derived from the materials prohibited by this rule.


The prohibited materials are deemed to be risky because it has been known that these materials are more likely than others to carry an abnormal form of a protein known as prion, which is widely recognized as the causative agent for mad cow disease even though what really causes the fatal brain wasting disease in cattle remains to be further researched.

It's also recognized that risk materials from cattle with mad cow disease when used to prepare animal feed can spread the disease to the cattle that are fed the tainted feed because of the abnormal protein, which is known to be extremely resilient and hard to destroy.

The new rule is at least in part based on the results of a so called Harvard-Tuskegee Study completed in 2001, which suggested that " with the protective measures in place in the United States in 2003, the introduction of BSE would result in limited spread, and the disease would be eliminated over time."  The USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) released in mid-July 2006 a further revised Harvard Risk Assessment, which confirmed the original findings in the Harvard-Tuskegee Study and provided a revised model predicting that " removal of specified risk materials (SRMs) from all animal feed would result in a substantial reduction of any residual BSE disease agent not eliminated by the 1997 feed ban, because doing so eliminated transmissions resulting from cross-contamination and on-farm misfeeding."

The current ruminant feed ban (21 CFR 589.2000) implemented in the country prohibits use of certain mammalian origin proteins in ruminant feed, but allows the use of these materials in feed for non-ruminant animals and evidence has showed that such a measure is no sufficient to eliminate all transmission of BSE.  For instance, new cases continued to be found in cattle born in the U.K. after implementation of a ruminant-to-ruminant feed ban.  In the United States, although compliance with the 1997 feed ban by the U.S. animal feed industry has been very high, inspections of feed manufacturing firms have identified some instances of inadequate cleanout procedures, mislabeling and recordkeeping deficiencies, according to the rule.  The FDA also believe that certain cattle derived risk materials in the non-ruminant feed supply presents a potential source of exposure in the United States.


Buy a copy of the 144 page "Final Rule" from foodconsumer.org







© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites














disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | abou t us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | beyondcreditcards.com | DaytonaCPA.com |
Get Google Ads Free | Download Movies | Search Public Records | Stock Trading Robot
Satellite for PC | Let Your Car Burn Water | The Affiliate Conspiracy | Run a Car on Water
Top Movie Downloads | Reverse Phone Detective | Get Paid for Surveys | Fat Loss 4 Idiots

© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.