Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Letter to Editor
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search






Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Submit news[release]
General health News



Get to know importance of water
Water for Life USA KYK Harmony Water Ionizer


More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

Food & Health : Laws & Politics Last Updated: Apr 16, 2008 - 5:52:06 PM


Imported Colombian Beef Will Pose Food Safety Issue
By R-CALF USA
Apr 7, 2008 - 6:18:06 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
Imported Colombian Beef Will Pose Food Safety Issue;

House, Senate Urged to Vote Against Trade Deal

Washington, D.C. - R-CALF USA will urge members of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate to vote against the proposed free trade agreement (FTA) with Colombia, due in part to concerns about food safety issues related to imported Colombian beef.

"The Colombia FTA would limit inspections and safety requirements for food imported into the U.S. from there, as this FTA speeds up the implementation of mechanisms to facilitate trade rules, including 'equivalence determinations' that require the U.S. to permit imports of meat and poultry products that do not meet U.S. safety standards," said R-CALF USA Region VII Director Eric Nelson, who also co-chairs the group's trade committee.

"Once the so-called 'equivalence' is achieved, Colombian food products to be imported into the U.S. must only meet the standards of the exporting country - not those of the importing country," Nelson explained.

Additionally, the Colombia FTA is, essentially, an extension of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) because it continues to treat cattle and beef as if they were storable industrial goods, rather than perishable and cyclical products.

"The ITC (International Trade Commission) and Congress made a mistake in 1993 when they passed NAFTA because they predicted that NAFTA likely would have no impact on the U.S. cattle industry because duties, at that time, were already considered small," said Nelson. "However, the trade surplus the U.S. had in beef trade between Mexico and Canada soon evaporated, and after 1996, the U.S. experienced persistent beef trade deficits between these two NAFTA countries. By 2005, the deficit had reached $613 million.

"Another concern is that the U.S. is expected to export to Colombia primarily high quality beef products, while Colombia will be able to send to us beef in which we have no idea what production standards were used," he pointed out. "As we've now learned from importing tainted products from China, the production phase of producing the final food product is crucial to ensuring the products' wholesomeness, quality and safety. The U.S. inspects only about 11 percent of imported beef, pork and poultry, and we certainly don't have the resources to ensure that Colombia is not using veterinary drugs, pesticides and feed supplements that are banned here in the United States."

Additionally, the Colombia FTA's rule of origin does not require beef to be derived from cattle born, raised and slaughtered in Colombia.

"That means live cattle from surrounding South American countries can be exported to Colombia, slaughtered in Colombia, and the resulting beef would qualify to be exported to the United States," Nelson said. "The U.S. has the highest production standards in the world and we should be using trade agreements to help elevate the production standards in foreign countries, not lowering our standards simply to facilitate more beef imports into the U.S., as the Colombia FTA would do.

"The Colombia FTA will only worsen what's already a precarious situation because the goal of this agreement is to facilitate imports into the U.S., which will result not only in an increased food safety risk, but also economic harm to U.S. cattle farmers and ranchers," Nelson concluded. "R-CALF urges each Representative and each Senator to oppose the Colombia FTA in no uncertain terms. It's not good for Rural America, and it's not good for the rest of the U.S.A."

 

                                                                                                             # # #

 

R-CALF USA (Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America) is a national, non-profit organization dedicated to ensuring the continued profitability and viability of the U.S. cattle industry. R-CALF USA represents thousands of U.S. cattle producers on trade and marketing issues. Members are located across 47 states and are primarily cow/calf operators, cattle backgrounders, and/or feedlot owners. R-CALF USA has dozens of affiliate organizations and various main-street businesses are associate members. For more information, visit www.r-calfusa.com  or, call 406-252-2516.




© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page







Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | abou t us | newsletter | contact us
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | beyondcreditcards.com | USMortgage101.com

© Copyright 2004 - 2007 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.