Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Foodconsumer & Others


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards


Food & Health : Laws & Politics Last Updated: Apr 20, 2011 - 9:38:09 AM


USDA adopts novel meat inspection plan
By USDA
Feb 23, 2007 - 9:16:36 AM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
Statement of Dr. Richard Raymond, USDA Under Secretary for Food Safety: Risk-Based Inspection at Processing Establishments

"With the announcement of a tentative timetable for the implementation of a more robust risk-based inspection system in processing establishments, the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is once again demonstrating its determination and commitment to a transparent and inclusive process.

"As I indicated based on comments received from stakeholders at a two-day public meeting in October, FSIS intends to gradually implement risk-based inspection in a careful and deliberative manner. We are proposing that beginning in April, FSIS inspection program personnel will begin performing food safety verification procedures based on risk in 30 prototype locations, performing inspection tasks for the first time based on an objective measurement of a plant's inspection track record and the relative risk of what is produced. FSIS inspection program personnel will be applying their knowledge, training and experience in a way that we believe will further protect public health. FSIS will conduct ongoing analysis of the tasks inspectors perform in these locations without computer-driven task scheduling. Improvements will be identified and implemented. If all goes well at the 30 prototype locations, the number will be gradually expanded to 150 locations by the end of this calendar year.

"As the Resolve report made clear, all stakeholders agree that dedicating more inspection resources to those plants that are not demonstrating effective and consistent control of risk is a sound concept. Resolve is the third party facilitator recommended by the National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection. Everyone agrees that not all plants and all processes pose an equal risk to public health and that FSIS should have the ability to shift resources as needed to more proactively protect the public from foodborne illness from meat, poultry and egg products.

"While FSIS proposes to begin the implementation process in April, we fully intend to continue discussing and receiving input on the specific components of risk-based inspection in an effort to continue improving the value of our data and how it is applied. However, FSIS believes that the data today is sound, comprehensive and reliable and we do not intend to let the desire for perfection impede the potential to make real and immediate improvements when public health is at stake. As I have said previously, risk-based inspection at processing establishments is about improving the effectiveness of inspection and protecting public health. It will not reduce the number of inspectors nor will it save any money.

"In the coming months, we intend to conduct a second expert elicitation to further refine our ranking of products. Among the changes in the second elicitation will be asking experts, including those with public health expertise, to consider the severity of potential illness in determining a product's risk, which was suggested by various groups.

"We also plan technical briefings to discuss the use of production volume, industry data, noncompliance records, expert elicitations and foodborne disease attribution data as part of a more robust risk-based inspection system.

"Risk-based inspection has benefited from the free exchange of ideas and constructive suggestions presented to us by our stakeholders. These valuable insights will continually be sought in many ways as the process of implementing risk-based inspection in processing establishments continues."

#

Last Modified: February 22, 2007


 
 
FSIS Proposes Timeline for Risk-Based Inspection in Processing Plants
Congressional and Public Affairs
(202) 720-9113

Steven Cohen

WASHINGTON, Feb. 22, 2007 — USDA Under Secretary for Food Safety Dr. Richard Raymond today announced a timetable for introducing more robust risk-based inspection in processing plants, proposing to begin in April with 30 locations representing about 254 establishments and potentially expanding to approximately 150 locations by the end
of 2007.

To better protect public health, the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) intends to better utilize  the information regularly collected by inspection program personnel at processing establishments to improve food safety. By taking into account the relative risk of what each processing plant produces and how each plant is controlling risk in its operations, FSIS will more effectively allocate inspection resources to those processing plants needing it the most, while continuing daily inspection at all processing facilities. The level of inspection at a processing plant will be based on a number of objective factors such as public health related inspection noncompliances and FSIS microbiological testing results and will be updated each month so that inspection resources can be adjusted as conditions change. This enhanced inspection system will be more proactive in terms of preventing human illness and will yield greater confidence that meat, poultry and egg products are safe. Risk-based inspection in processing establishments has benefited from the input and expertise of all stakeholders during its development.

"To continue to prevent foodborne illness, we have to improve our prevention capabilities, not just respond quickly after an outbreak occurs," Raymond said. "Our inspectors visit every one of these plants every day and that won't change. What will change is we will no longer be treating every plant like every other plant in terms of its adverse public health potential and we will start using the information and the inspection expertise we already have in ways that better protect consumers."

Raymond noted that incorporating risk prevention more thoroughly into inspection activities has been an ongoing process at FSIS, from the implementation of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) system in 1998 to the 2006 Salmonella reduction initiative.

Raymond said that gradually implementing risk-based inspection will ensure that all aspects of the program can be thoroughly evaluated and revised as needed before it is expanded nationwide. He added that the open and transparent process that has characterized the initiative will continue with the scheduling of a series of technical briefings to discuss the use of production volume, industry data, non-compliance records, expert elicitations and foodborne disease attribution data as part of a more robust risk-based inspection system.





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












We have moved to Food Consumer . Org



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | Buy Viagra | MarketAmerica.com |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | DaytonaCPA.com | Take Your Blog to a Higher Level
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.