Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Foodconsumer & Others


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards


Diet & Health : Heart & Blood Last Updated: Apr 20, 2011 - 9:38:09 AM


Vitamin C lowers CRP just as well as statins
By Sarah Han
Nov 28, 2008 - 4:35:39 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   

Friday Nov. 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- One study we have recently reported found that statins lowered plasma C-reactive protein or CRP in people with relatively high CRP, but normal cholesterol levels.

 

This suggests that taking statins in those who have normal cholesterol, but high levels of CRP may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.

 

Statins are intended for people to lower their cholesterol levels so that they may reduce risk of heart disease.   But it has been known that CRP is another risk factor for heart disease.

 

Because of this, it is apparently that taking statins may help people with normal cholesterol but high CRP reduced cardiovascular risk.

 

The problem with statins is that the cost and side effects.

 

Is there any alternative, which is equally effective, but much safer than statins?   The answer is positive.

 

One study published in Oct 2008 issue of Free Radical Biology and Medicine suggests that taking as much as 1,000 mg of vitamin C per day is equally effective.

 

The study led by Block G and colleagues of the University of California in Berkley, California found that taking vitamin C reduced CRP by 25 percent in those with CRP indicative of elevated cardiovascular risk.

 

Block and colleagues wanted to know whether vitamin C or E could reduce CRP, which as a biomarker of cardiovascular risk has something to do with inflammation. Vitamin C and E as antioxidants are supposed to have an effect on inflammation.

 

For the study, the researchers enlisted 396 health nonsmokers and randomized them into three groups. One group of subjects were assigned 1,000 mg per day of vitamin C, the second group 800 iU   per day of vitamin E and the third group a placebo. The supplementation lasted for two months.

 

The overall mean CRP concentration was lower, 0.85 mg/L and no treatment effect was observed when all participants were included in the analysis.   However, a significant 25 percent reduction by vitamin C was observed among those who had CRP indicative of elevated cardiovascular risk.

 

This effect was similar to that achieved by statins, the authors of the study said.

 

However, there is no significant effect observed with vitamin E.

 

Block and team also found CRP is generally high in obese people.   Over 75 percent of obese people had CRP greater than 1.0 mg/L.   They suggested that research is needed to determine whether reducing CRP could reduce diseases related to obesity.






© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












We have moved to Food Consumer . Org



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | Buy Viagra | MarketAmerica.com |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | DaytonaCPA.com | Take Your Blog to a Higher Level
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.