Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

Diet & Health : Heart & Blood Last Updated: Jun 30, 2008 - 11:14:37 AM


Cardiovascular Health : Hard Data for Hard Water
By Adrian Burton
Mar 6, 2008 - 1:48:26 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
Are people who drink "hard" water containing higher levels of calcium and/or magnesium less likely to suffer cardiovascular disease? This is the question that delegates who attended a World Health Organization (WHO) meeting 21–22 January 2008 in Geneva, Switzerland, are now trying to answer once and for all.

The idea that hard water—particularly that with higher magnesium concentrations—helps ward off cardiovascular problems has been around for 50 years. However, due to the ecologic nature of most studies, uncontrolled confounding factors, and the different variables and outcomes measured, no firm conclusions have ever been drawn. The WHO is therefore coordinating worldwide efforts to compare cardiovascular morbidity before and after changes in the calcium/magnesium content of water supplies.

The aim of the Geneva meeting was to discuss how such a study—ultimately a composite of many smaller studies from different nations—should be performed. "A prospective, multi-country study following a single protocol would be the best way to ensure a sufficiently large sample for overall analysis . . . if we are to make meaningful comparisons," says Paul Hunter, a professor of health protection at the University of East Anglia, United Kingdom, whose group has been testing a possible protocol.

Hunter's work involved obtaining mortality and residence data on individuals in areas where notable changes in water hardness had occurred through the introduction or cessation of softening practices, allowing trends in cardiovascular mortality before and after the change in water hardness to be detected.

Controlling the confounding factors in a final meta-analysis involving populations from different countries could pose problems, but "the 'before and after' nature of the individual studies should certainly provide meaningful results at the population level," he says.

The mechanism by which hard water may provide protection against cardiovascular disease remains a matter of debate. The extra calcium it carries could help reduce blood pressure, whereas low serum magnesium concentrations—common to people living in soft-water areas—appear linked with arrhythmias. "Couple this with the fact that many of today's refined foods are low in magnesium, that many people in developed countries either do not cover or only barely cover their magnesium needs, and that magnesium in drinking water is more bioavailable than that in food, and you can see how [even the relatively small] extra supply of this mineral to people in hard-water areas could be beneficial," says Frantisek Kozísek, head of the National Reference Centre for Drinking Water in Prague, Czech Republic. "Cooking food in soft water also tends to remove magnesium, calcium, and other essential elements from food, making matters worse."

The results could lead to countries adopting legislation to supplement drinking water supplies in soft-water areas with calcium and magnesium. Kozísek has already proposed that levels of calcium and magnesium in drinking water be set at 40–80 mg/L and 20–30 mg/L, respectively. "The available evidence suggests these ranges could be beneficial, and . . . there is no evidence that harder water causes any harm," he explains.

Regu Regunathan, a consultant for the Water Quality Association, says that any recommendations on magnesium or other minerals must be based on absolutely solid data; otherwise, desalination plants and industries providing water softeners and reverse osmosis devices could be needlessly affected. Indeed, soft water has palpable technical advantages over hard water, including reduced scaling in appliances, pipes, and on surfaces, as well as better soap lathering. To this, Kozísek responds, "If health and technical aspects of water are in contradiction, then cost–benefit analyses of the consequences of both aspects should be made to decide what is more important for society."

from
EHP





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites














disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | abou t us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | beyondcreditcards.com | DaytonaCPA.com
Get Google Ads Free | Download Movies | Search Public Records | Stock Trading Robot
Satellite for PC | Let Your Car Burn Water | The Affiliate Conspiracy | Run a Car on Water
Top Movie Downloads | Reverse Phone Detective | Get Paid for Surveys | Fat Loss 4 Idiots

© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.