Doctors in Berlin said a man was cured of AIDS after he
received bone marrow transplant from a donor naturally resistant to HIV
virus.
The man had been negative for HIV
for nearly two years ever since the treatment.
But the experts quickly warned that the treatment is not
feasible for most AIDS patients or HIV carriers because for one thing donors
with the genetic mutation that may be responsible for the miraculous cure are rare.
Only one
in every 1,000 Europeans and Americans may carry the desirable mutation.
Other obstacles to successfully receiving the procedure
are high risk of dying from the procedures itself.
Studies showed 20 to 30 percent of patients die
from bone marrow transplant because the sick bone marrow needs to be killed by
high doses of radiation and or medications.
Even if some people can find a HIV-resistant donor and be
able to survive the procedure, bone marrow transplant is too costly for
millions of HIV carriers and AIDS patients who live in Africa where the disease
is most commonly seen.
The 42-year-old man suffered both leukemia and HIV.
Ever since he received the transplant at
Berlin's Charite clinic two years ago, he had been free of HIV virus as tests
on the man's bone marrow, blood and other organ tissues had been all clear.
Scientists believe the mutated gene of concern, called
Delta 32, prevents HIV from attaching itself to cells by blocking a receptor
called CCR5.
But doctors are not so sure if the man was cured because
of the genetic mutation in the donated bone marrow.
But theoretically, knocking out the receptor
by a gene therapy may be a future treatment for AIDS, Professor Andrew Sewell,
University of Cardiff, was cited by BBC as saying.
This German case is an exceptional, said a health
observer. Previous reports showed that bone marrow transplantation could be
more likely to spread HIV than cure AIDS.
One report published in the Aug 1993 issue of Bone Marrow
Transplantation says a 41-year-old woman who underwent autologous bone marrow
transplantation for non-Hod.gkin's lym.phoma ended up found HIV positive. After
treatment, she was complicated by a series of infections and required to receive
prolonged blood product support.
Unfortunately she was found seropositive for anti-HIV
about 6 months later after transplantation. The blood donors were screened for
HIV antibody and HIV antigen. Jootar S and colleagues , authors of the report, from
Ramathibodi Hospital of Mahidol University in Thailand suspected that HIV
spread through the donated bone marrow.
Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only.
The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals.
Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.