Testosterone, the male sex hormone, boosts sexual desire
and activities in postmenopausal women, according to a recent study.
But a small review published earlier said the
effect of the male hormone therapy on the risk of breast cancer remains uncertain.
Off-label use of testosterone is allowed in the United
States although the FDA has not approved this treatment for low sexual function
or hypoactive sexual desire disorder particularly in postmenopausal women who
experience surgery induced menopause.
The review titled "breast cancer risk in
postmenopausal women using testosterone in combination with hormone replacement
therapy" was conducted by Bitzer JJ and colleagues of University-Women's
Hospital Basel in Basel, Switzerland and published in March 2008 in the journal
Maturitas.
The authors searched records in Medline from 1969 through
July 2007 and MEBASE and Biosis from 1990 through July 2007 for original
reports in English and French.
They
found no prospective randomized clinical trials were ever conducted to evaluate
the risk of breast cancer from the testosterone treatment.
They found only five studies (two case-control studies,
two cohort studies and one retrospective observational study), but the results
were inconsistent. The researchers said all studies had severe methodological
limitations and formulations and dosages used were not optimal.
They conclude that "at present, there are no valid
randomized or observational clinical studies that provide evidence that the
addition of testosterone to conventional postmenopausal hormone therapy
influences breast cancer risk."
One recent trial conducted by Susan Davis of Monash
University in Melbourne, Australia and colleagues showed that use of testosterone
patches made by Procter & Gamble for 24 weeks more than doubled monthly
sexual episodes at a high dose in women with low sexual desire and activities.
But in the one year trial, published in the November 2008
issue of the New England Journal, breast cancer was diagnosed in four of the
534 postmenopausal women treated with the male hormone compared to none in the
277 placebo recipients.
Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only.
The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals.
Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.