Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]

Viagra

Isotonix

More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards


General Health : Drug News Last Updated: Oct 29, 2008 - 11:04:25 AM


More about HPV vaccine you need to know
By Sue Mueller
Oct 12, 2008 - 11:28:35 AM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   

Merck has done a good job pursuing 25 percent of girls ages 13 to 17 to get its HPV vaccine called Gardasil as shown by the survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 

Gardasil was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2006 indicated to prevent cervical cancer induced by a couple of HPV or human papillomavirus. Afterward, the CDC recommended that states require that young girls get vaccinated with this vaccine to prevent this rare cancer.

 

While trial results indicated the vaccine is highly effective in preventing precancerous lesions in some groups of study participants that could potentially lead to development of cervical cancer, questions about the long term safety and efficacy remain to be answered.

 

Trials of Gardasil involved largely subjects older than 13 years while the CDC recommends that this HPV vaccine be used in girls age 11. Trials are often very strict in terms of the study population. Age is one of parameters health workers and government officials need to consider when they interpret the trial results.   Applying results derived from trials of older girls to younger girls needs a leap in faith.

 

In addition, the trials were conducted in a short term, meaning that the long term safety and efficacy of this HPV vaccine remains unknown.   Even the short-term safety is questionable as the federal government has received thousands of reports on severe adverse effects including deaths.

 

Regardless of the efficacy and safety of the HPV vaccine, cervical cancer although life-threatening to the woman who has acquired it actually occurs in only a very small number of women.   Official data show each year about 4,000 women die from this disease, a risk that is much smaller than the risk of dying from a traffic incident!

 

There are many strains of HPV, but only a few pose a small risk of cervical cancer.   This virus is self-limiting and most men and women can naturally clear all types of HPV strains in two years and only those women who are vulnerable to persistent infections are at high risk of cervical cancer.   Women who repeatedly get infected with HPV could have underlying problems with their immune defense system making them susceptible to cervical cancer.  Evidence has suggested that HPV per se does not mean any risk for developing cervical cancer.

 

One fact about the HPV vaccine that may not be well publicized is that this HPV vaccine could do more harm than good in women who have acquired some HPV or those who are vulnerable to repeated infections.

 

Evidence showed that HPV vaccine does not help women who have had HPV infection.  At least one study has shown that the HPV vaccine can actually increase the risk of cervical cancer in women who were vulnerable to repeated or persistent infections of certain HPV.

 

Those who consider getting their daughters vaccinated with HPV vaccine or Gardasil need to consider these facts as summarized as follows:

 

1) Deaths from cervical cancer are rare compared to many other types of life-threatening cancers such as breast cancer. The risk is very small compared to the death risk from traffic incidents and many other risks.

 

2) The long term safety and efficacy of HPV vaccine remains unknown.   Even if the vaccine works for some girls, it is not known whether or not they need a booster or two later.

 

3) HPV vaccine boosts risk of cervical cancer in those who are prone to repeated or persistent infections. The vaccine does not work in women who have already had HPV.

 

4) Getting HPV vaccine does not completely protect girls or women from cervical cancer.  Those who have gotten the vaccine still need to receive Pap test or Pap smear screening just as those who do not get the vaccine.






© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












Do you know vitamin C lowers blood pressure?

disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | Buy Viagra | MarketAmerica.com |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | DaytonaCPA.com |
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.