Merck has done a good job pursuing 25 percent of girls
ages 13 to 17 to get its HPV vaccine called Gardasil as shown by the survey
conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Gardasil was approved by the Food and Drug Administration
in 2006 indicated to prevent cervical cancer induced by a couple of HPV or
human papillomavirus. Afterward, the CDC recommended that states require that young
girls get vaccinated with this vaccine to prevent this rare cancer.
While trial results indicated the vaccine is highly
effective in preventing precancerous lesions in some groups of study
participants that could potentially lead to development of cervical cancer,
questions about the long term safety and efficacy remain to be answered.
Trials of Gardasil involved largely subjects older than
13 years while the CDC recommends that this HPV vaccine be used in girls age
11. Trials are often very strict in terms of the study population. Age is one
of parameters health workers and government officials need to consider when
they interpret the trial results.
Applying results derived from trials of older girls to younger girls
needs a leap in faith.
In addition, the trials were conducted in a short term,
meaning that the long term safety and efficacy of this HPV vaccine remains
unknown.
Even the short-term safety is
questionable as the federal government has received thousands of reports on
severe adverse effects including deaths.
Regardless of the efficacy and safety of the HPV vaccine,
cervical cancer although life-threatening to the woman who has acquired it actually
occurs in only a very small number of women.
Official data show each year about 4,000 women die from this disease, a
risk that is much smaller than the risk of dying from a traffic incident!
There are many strains of HPV, but only a few pose a
small risk of cervical cancer.
This
virus is self-limiting and most men and women can naturally clear all types of
HPV strains in two years and only those women who are vulnerable to persistent
infections are at high risk of cervical cancer.
Women who repeatedly get infected with HPV could have underlying
problems with their immune defense system making them susceptible to cervical
cancer.
Evidence has suggested that HPV
per se does not mean any risk for developing cervical cancer.
One fact about the HPV vaccine that may not be well
publicized is that this HPV vaccine could do more harm than good in women who
have acquired some HPV or those who are vulnerable to repeated infections.
Evidence showed that HPV vaccine does not help
women who have had HPV infection.
At least one study has shown that the HPV
vaccine can actually increase the risk of cervical cancer in women who were
vulnerable to repeated or persistent infections of certain HPV.
Those who consider getting their daughters vaccinated
with HPV vaccine or Gardasil need to consider these facts as summarized as
follows:
1) Deaths from cervical cancer are rare compared to many
other types of life-threatening cancers such as breast cancer. The risk is very
small compared to the death risk from traffic incidents and many other risks.
2) The long term safety and efficacy of HPV vaccine
remains unknown.
Even if the vaccine
works for some girls, it is not known whether or not they need a booster or two
later.
3) HPV vaccine boosts risk of cervical cancer in those
who are prone to repeated or persistent infections. The vaccine does not work
in women who have already had HPV.
4) Getting HPV vaccine does not completely protect girls
or women from cervical cancer.
Those who
have gotten the vaccine still need to receive Pap test or Pap smear screening
just as those who do not get the vaccine.
Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only.
The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals.
Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.