Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Letter to Editor
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search






Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Submit news[release]
General health News



Get to know importance of water
Water for Life USA KYK Harmony Water Ionizer


More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

General Health : Drug News Last Updated: May 8, 2008 - 4:15:10 PM


Patch contraceptive poses higher risk
By Sue Mueller
May 8, 2008 - 4:13:51 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   

TURSDAY May 8, 2008 (Foodconsumer.org) -- Public Citizen today submitted a petition to the Food and Drug Administration asking the agency to pull off Ortho-Evra Patch, a contraceptive made by Johnson and Johnson, from the market in six months.

In a statement, the consumer advocate said women who used the patch were twice as likely to develop blood clots as those who used other types of standard oral contraceptives.

Public Citizen said the reason it asked the FDA to complete the withdrawal within six months rather than immediately is because it fears that women who are on the drug may not be able to swift to use of other types of contraceptives as quickly they should.

The problem with this drug, according to the organization, is that Ortho-Evra Patch exposes women to dangerous estrogen levels.   The finding was based on unpublished studies that have been released due to ongoing litigations.

Compared to standard oral contraceptives, Ortho-Evra exposes women to "more estrogen and a greater range of estrogen levels; a possible two-fold increase in the risk of blood clots; increased painful side effects such as breast discomfort, severe menstrual pain, nausea and vomiting; an increased likelihood of discontinued contraceptive use; and no improvement in contraceptive outcomes."

The overall exposure to estrogen from the Ortho-Evra patch was 55 to 60 percent higher from the patch than a standard estrogen oral contraceptive, according to the nation’s most powerful consumer group.   Absorbed amounts of estrogen from the patches were 1.2 to 3.5 times higher compared to the oral contraceptives.

High exposure to estrogen is known to be risky for women. More women who wore the patches complained they experienced breast discomfort, painful periods, nausea and vomiting and discontinuation than women who used oral contraceptives.

Studies have found women using the patch had an up to two-fold increase in risk of blood clots compared to those who used standard oral contraceptives.

"Women deserve a level of risk at least comparable to or less than the pill for their hormonal contraceptive," said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of the Health Research Group at Public Citizen.

"The absence of any evidence of a unique benefit combined with the considerable safety problems of high-dose, variable estrogen exposure in Ortho-Evra tips the balance of risks and benefits against its availability as a contraceptive."





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page







Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | abou t us | newsletter | contact us
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | beyondcreditcards.com |

© Copyright 2004 - 2007 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.