Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

General Health : Drug News Last Updated: Oct 15, 2008 - 6:10:51 AM


Hormone-linked elevated cancer risk persists
By Ben Wasserman
Mar 4, 2008 - 4:56:27 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
TUESDAY MARCH 4, 2008 (Foodconsumer.org) -- Menopausal women who resort to hormone replacement therapy to ease their menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes may want to know this, an increased risk for certain cancers associated with hormone therapy remain nearly three years after they stopped the treatment.

An early analysis revealed that women in a major study who took estrogen and progesterone had elevated risk for breast cancer and heart disease among others, which prompted the federal funded Women's Health Initiative study to be terminated earlier than planned.

Many scientists and laymen alike would have thought that once the hormone treatment discontinues, the elevated cancer risk would disappear and treated women would have the same or similar cancer risk for women who did not use hormones.
 
The new study of more than 15,000 women aged 50 to 79 proved that that is not the case.

The results showed that the overall cancer risk 2.4 years after women quit hormone therapy was 24 percent higher than that for women who were not treated. The elevated risk for breast cancer after discontinuation of the treatment was 27 percent higher.  Also the women who used hormone therapy had a higher risk of lung cancer, which is another surprise.

The only benefit expected out of the hormone therapy, bone health, also disappeared after women quit taking hormones.  However, stoppage of hormone treatment somehow reduced the heart risk to the level for those who did not take the hormone treatment.

No one knows what risk the women treated with hormones will have to face afterwards.

The results from the current study seem to be shocking enough to irritate many in the medical industry who seemingly worried that postmenopausal women would be scared away from taking the hormone therapy.

Peter M. Ravdin from the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center said of the study results "It's not convincing. All the epidemiological data argues against their results."  Ravdin early reported that incidence of breast cancer was on the decline after the hormone therapy was halted, a finding that others had different explanations.

Hugh S. Taylor of Yale University School of Medicine said, cited by news media, "It's a fairly small risk, and when women hear about this it plays to their fears. I think they are suffering needlessly because of an exaggerated risk."

A health observer affiliated with foodconsumer.org suggested that those women who are concerned about the safety of hormone therapy may try alternative ways.  Some studies found use of soybeans helps women ease menopausal symptoms.





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












Do you know vitamin C lowers blood pressure?

disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | abou t us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | Buy a home | DaytonaCPA.com |
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.