Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

Misc. News : Consumer Affair Last Updated: Jun 30, 2008 - 11:14:37 AM


High levels of mercury found in tuna sushi
By Ben Wasserman
Jan 23, 2008 - 9:00:21 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
Editor's note:  We apologize that there is an error in the original article. "the 1-ppm limit set by the government agencies is ten times higher than the actual level that triggers adverse effects" should be "the 1-ppm limit set by the government agencies is ten times lower than the actual level that triggers adverse effects." The error has been corrected.


WEDNESDAY JAN 23, 2008 (Foodconsumer.org) -- A study by the New York Times shows that sushi sold in many restaurants in the New York City contains risky levels of mercury, up to 1.4 parts per million (ppm) or 0.4 ppm higher than the limit set by the U.S. government.

The New York Times study sampled and tested sushi from 20 restaurants and found sushi from 5 of them had mercury at levels high enough for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to take legal action to pull off the fish used in sushi from the market.

The mercury tests conducted in October covered some of the city's well-known sushi restaurants including Drew Nieporent’s Nobu Next Door, part of the famed Nobu restaurant chain, as well as the high-end grocer, Gourmet Garage, Newsinferno.com reported.

Sushi with higher than 1 ppm of mercury came from the Manhattan restaurants Nobu Next Door, Sushi Seki, Sushi of Gari and Blue Ribbon Sushi and the food store Gourmet Garage. The highest level of mercury (1.4 ppm) was found in tuna from Blue Robbon Sushi and the sushi with the lowest level of mercury was purchased from Fairway.

Higher levels of mercury were often found in the higher-priced bluefin tuna sushi, which is often served at the most prestigious eateries.  Food stores were less likely to carry the blue fin tuna sushi.

In comparison, yellowfin and albacore contain relatively lower levels of mercury, the New York Times found.  Some stores in the study said the tuna in their sushi was yellowfin.

Mercury in certain types of fish is a concern to some consumers.  The FDA and Environmental Protection Agency has issued a joint fish consumption advisory saying that consumers should avoid consuming shark, swordfish, king mackerel, and tilefish which carry high levels of mercury.

But the agencies also say that "Levels of mercury in other fish can vary. You can safely eat up to 12 ounces (2 to 3 meals) of other purchased fish and shellfish a week. Mix up the types of fish and shellfish you eat and do not eat the same type of fish and shellfish more than once a week."

In addition, the FDA and EPA advise that "Check local advisories about the safety of fish caught by family and friend in your local rivers and streams. If no advice is available, you can safely eat up to 6 ounces (one meal) per week of fish you catch from local waters, but don't consume any other fish during that week."

The Environmental Working Group, a science-based not-for-profit organization that promotes environmental health, criticized the government's advisory saying that some tuna in the safe list actually contains risky levels of mercury. For details about recommendations on fish consumption by the organization, visit www.ewg.org

The New York Times study caught attention of an organization called Center For Consumer Freedom which issued a press release today Jan 23 saying that the New York Times should retract error-filled mercury story.

The organization, which defends against many studies or findings that could potentially affect consumers' eating habits, said in its statement that the 1-ppm limit set by the government agencies is ten times lower than the actual level that triggers adverse effects.

Mercury is a neurotoxin which is believed to have the biggest negative impact on fetuses and children whose brains are still in development although high intake of mercury through foods can also significantly affect adults.

Particularly pregnant women should be aware of the risk associated with fish consumption and avoid consuming the risky types of fish, a health advocate affiliated with foodconsumer.org suggests.  Those who believe eating fish is good for children's brains may consider using quality fish oil or cod liver oil during pregnancy.

For more information on what fish to eat, read http://www.ewg.org/safefishlist
For more information on FDA/EPA fish consumption advisory, read http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/admehg3.html




© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites














disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | abou t us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | beyondcreditcards.com | DaytonaCPA.com
Get Google Ads Free | Download Movies | Search Public Records | Stock Trading Robot
Satellite for PC | Let Your Car Burn Water | The Affiliate Conspiracy | Run a Car on Water
Top Movie Downloads | Reverse Phone Detective | Get Paid for Surveys | Fat Loss 4 Idiots

© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.