Saturday Dec. 20, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- Overwhelming evidence has suggested that a wide variety
of cancers including breast cancer have something to do with vitamin D insufficiency
or deficiency.
Only a very few studies failed
to establish the association.
One study led by Freedman DM and colleagues from the
National Cancer Institute and published in the April 2008 issue of Cancer Epidemiology
Biomarkers Prevention is one of those that did not find any association between
serum vitamin D and breast cancer risk.
Freedman's study involved 1,005 incident breast cancer
cases and 1,005 age-matched controls who entered the study between 1993 and
2001 and were followed through 2005. The subjects were aged 55 to 74 years and
serum 1, 25-hydrooxyvitamin D and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D were tested at baseline.
The researchers did not find any association between 1, 25-hydroxyvitamin
D or 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer risk. That is, those who were
in the quintile of highest levels of 1, 25-hydroxyvitamin D were at the same
risk as those who were in the quintile of lowest levels.
Even worse, those who had the highest levels of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin
D, most potent active form of vitamin D, were 23 percent more likely to be
diagnosed with breast cancer than those with the lowest levels.
The study has some limitation, a health observer at
foodconsumer.org suggested.
Although
test results of vitamin D indicated the accurate vitamin D status for an
individual, the vitamin D level at the time of testing may not be indicative of
the individual's history of exposure to vitamin D or sunlight.
More than a dozen of studies including those by Garland
CF and Garland FC of the University of California in San Diego that considered
the history of exposure to sunlight or intake of vitamin D have found that high
vitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of breast cancer.
A recent study by Garland et al. found “
individuals with serum 25(OH) D of approximately 52
ng/ml had 50% lower risk of breast cancer than those with serum <13 ng/ml.”
To achieve such a serum level of vitamin D,
one needs to take 4000 IU of vitamin D3 daily.
Garland's study published in J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007 Mar;103(3-5):708-11 has been recently confirmed by Abbas S and colleagues from German Cancer Research Center
in Heidelberg, Germany.
Abbas et al. published their study in the Jan 2009 issue of International Journal of Cancer showed that compared to premenopausal women who had only
less than 30 nmol/L vitamin D, women who had 30-45, 45-60, >/=60 nmol/L were
at a 32, 41 and 55 percent reduced risk of breast cancer respectively.
Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only.
The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals.
Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.