Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Foodconsumer & Others


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]

Viagra

Isotonix

More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards


Diet & Health : Cancer Last Updated: Nov 17, 2008 - 12:44:15 PM


Vitamin E cuts breast cancer risk - study
By David Liu, Ph. D.
Nov 17, 2008 - 11:46:40 AM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
Viatmi.n C lowers bloo.d pressur.e

Monday Nov 17, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- Taking vitamin E and vitamin C may not provide any protective effect against prostate cancer, according to a new study scheduled to be presented Sunday at an American Academy of Cancer Research (AACR) meeting in Washington, D.C.

 

The Physicians' Health Study II, a randomized clinical trial, involved 14, 641 physicians age at least 50 at enrollment.   Participants were given 400 IU of vitamin E or 500 mg of vitamin C or a placebo each day for up to 10 years.

 

There was no association between vitamin E and risk of prostate cancer, which afflicts about 200,000 men in the United States each year.   Vitamin C was not effective either against total cancer.

 

But not all studies are so disappointing. Early studies have shown that I.V. injection of high doses of vitamin C actually kills cancer cells while leaving healthy ones intact.   And many studies linked intake of vitamin C and vitamin E rich diet with lower incidence of cancer.

 

One study published in the Sep 2008 issue of Breast Cancer Research and Treatment suggests that vitamin E and B supplement may actually provide protection against breast cancer among women who had low dietary intake of these vitamins.

 

The case-control study led by Dorjgochoo T and colleagues from School of Medicine of Vanderbilt University involved 3,454 incident breast cancer cases and 3,474 controls entering the study in Shanghai.  Those who enrolled for the phase I study were at the age of 25 to 64 while those for the phase II study were at the age of 20 to 70.

 

Overall, there was no association between intake of vitamins A, B, C and E and breast cancer, the researchers reported.  

 

Nevertheless, among those who had low dietary intake of vitamin E, taking vitamin E supplements was associated with a 20 percent reduction in the risk.

 

Similarly, taking vitamin B supplements was also linked to a 20 percent reduction in the risk of breast cancer among those who had low dietary intake of vitamin B, but the reduction was not statically significant.

 

However, frequency use of a vitamin B supplement seemed to boost the risk by 40 percent among women who have high dietary intake of vitamin B.

 

The protective effect of vitamin E and C and others against cancer including prostate cancer is a complicated issue.   More research is certainly needed to prove or disprove previous findings.





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












Do you know vitamin C lowers blood pressure?

disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | Buy Viagra | MarketAmerica.com |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | DaytonaCPA.com |
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.