Wednesday November 5, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- Taking vitamin
B supplements like folic acid, vitamin B 6 and vitamin B 12 regularly may not
help prevent cancer, according to a new study led by Dr. Shumin Zhang and
colleagues at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School.
The study published in the Journal of the American
Medical Association followed 5,442 female health professionals at the average age
of 63 in the United States for 7.5 years and found taking B vitamins pills did
not reduce risk of cancer or risk of dying from cancer.
The women had cardiovascular disease or risk
factors like high blood pressure or high cholesterol levels.
The researchers found, however, among women aged 65 and
older, those getting the daily B vitamins had a 25 percent reduced risk of
developing any type of cancer and a 38 percent reduced risk of developing
breast cancer.
A health observer cautioned that regardless of the
findings, the study was not a trial and the results of it did not mean to say
that taking vitamin B supplements are useless or definitely prevent cancer.
Trials are needed to confirm any findings.
The study is not the first looking at the link between
vitamin B supplements and risk of cancer.
And some have found some positive associations.
One study published in the June 1 2007 issue of Cancer
Research found that high dietary intake of b vitamins like folate, vitamin B6
and vitamin B12 reduced risk of pancreatic cancer by 81 percent, 73 percent and
59 percent respectively compared to low intake of these vitamins.
The study led by Eva Schernhammer, M.D., Dr.P.H. of
medicine at Harvard Medical School and colleagues also found that
supplementation of these B vitamins were linked with increased risk of this
rare yet lethal malignancy.
According to the researchers, study participants who reported
they used multivitamins and whose blood carried only traces of these B vitamins
had a 139 percent increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer.
"All we can say is that a person who has reason to
be concerned about their risk of developing this cancer, which is relatively
rare but quite deadly, should maintain a normal weight and eat their fruit and
vegetables," said Schernhammer.
For the study, the researchers analyzed combined data
from four large prospective cohort studies, The Women’s Health Initiative, and
three from the Harvard School of Public Health: the Nurses’ Health Study, the
Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and the Physician’s Health Study.
They compared food intake and vitamin use in 208
pancreatic cancer and 623 cancer free controls and found these associations.
The study was not meant to provide any explanation as to
how B vitamins reduce or increase risk of the cancer.
But Dr. Schernhammer speculated that B
vitamins may fuel growth of existing pancreatic cancer.
Some animal studies suggest that "if there is a
dormant tumor, folate and other similar vitamins may stimulate growth."
Dr. Schernhammer said this may be the same case if a
person does not take enough of these vitamins consistently through diet, and
then suddenly take vitamins supplements.
But the question is why the dietary B vitamins did not
increase the cancer risk?
No one knows
anything for sure.
But the dose may make
the difference.
One study in the journal Gut found people with either
high or low levels of folate in the blood had lower risk of colorectal cancer,
but those with moderate levels were twice as likely to develop the disease.
The study led by researchers from Umea University, Sweden
involved 226 people with colon cancer and 437 controls from the Northern Sweden
Health and Disease Cohort.
Participants
were surveyed for their lifestyle including diet and blood samples were analyzed
for circulating serum levels of folate.
While epidemiological studies yielded inconstant
conclusions, some laboratory studies support the notion that vitamins prevent
cancer.
One animal study published in the December 2007 issue of
the Journal of Nutrition showed that mild deficiency of dietary folate and
other B vitamins alters multiple components of the Wnt pathway, raising risk of
colorectal cancer.
Early preclinical and clinical studies suggest that
depletion of folate increases the risk of colorectal carcinogenesis.
Biochemical functions of folate depend on the adequate
availability of other 1-carbon nutrients such as riboflavin, vitamin B-6 and
vitamin B-12, prompting researchers to believe that deficiency of other B
vitamins may also play a role in the increased risk of colorectal cancer.
In the study, Z Liu from Tufts University and colleagues
from University of Southern California and Harvard Medical School fed 96 mice
diets with different combinations of B vitamin depletion for 10 weeks.
They found DNA strand breaks within the Apc mutation
cluster region were induced by folate depletion and inadequate availability of
riboflavin, vitamin B-6 and vitamin B-12.
But this effect was not seen when folate alone was deficient.
Apoptosis, programmed cell deaths that are missing in
cancer cells, was attenuated by the combined deficiency of B vitamins, but not
by deficiency of one or two single nutrients, Liu and team found.
All the evidence suggests that B vitamins together are
important in fighting cancer.
Folate is found in many foods
including bananas, oranges, leafy green vegetables, asparagus, broccoli, and
many sorts of beans and peas, and fortified cereals. Vitamin B6 is found
in fortified cereal, bananas, salmon, turkey, chicken, potato, spinach and vitamin b 12 is found in clams, mussels, crab,
salmon, and beef, to name a few.
Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only.
The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals.
Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.