Commercial Fishing Fatalities --- California, Oregon, and
Washington, 2000--2006
During 2000--2006, commercial fishing was one of the most dangerous occupations in the United States, with
an average annual fatality rate of 115 deaths per 100,000 fishermen. By contrast, the average annual occupational
fatality rate among all U.S. workers during the same period was four deaths per 100,000 workers
(
1).
During the 1990s, safety interventions in Alaska fisheries were
followed by declines in that state's commercial fishing fatality rates (
2). To assess the need for similar safety improvements in the other three Pacific Coast states, CDC analyzed data on
commercial fishing fatalities from California, Oregon, and Washington during 2000--2006. The results of that analysis
indicated that the three states combined had an average annual commercial fishing fatality rate of 238 deaths per 100,000
full-time equivalent (FTE) fishermen, approximately double the fishing fatality rate nationwide during the same
period. CDC also determined that safety equipment (e.g., immersion suits or life rafts) had not been used adequately in
these fatal events, and that the Northwest Dungeness crab fishery had the highest fatality rate of any fishery located off
the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington. To reduce fatalities among the Pacific Coast commercial fishermen
at greatest risk, additional prevention measures tailored to the Northwest Dungeness crab fishery should be considered.
A case was defined as a fatal occupational traumatic injury in the commercial fishing industry during
2000--2006 reported from California, Oregon, or Washington. Determination of an occupational fatality used established
guidelines for injury at work, which take into account where the injuries occurred (i.e., on or off employer premises) and
whether the person was being compensated for the activity at the time of the event
(
3).
Data were collected from multiple sources in each state, including
reports from the U.S. Coast Guard, local law enforcement agencies, and
local media; death certificates; and state-based occupational fatality
surveillance programs.
Fatality rates were calculated using estimates of the number
of FTE commercial fishermen for each year during 2000--2006; these
estimates considered the number of vessels participating in a fishery,
number of days at sea, and average number of crew members on board each
vessel. Estimates of the number of FTE fishermen in some small-scale
fisheries could not be determined; therefore, fatal events from those
fisheries were included in the descriptive statistics but not in the
rate calculations.
During 2000--2006, a total of 58 commercial fishing fatalities were reported from Oregon (21 [36%]), California
(20 [34%]), and Washington (17 [29%]) (Figure). The number of fatalities, by year, during 2000--2006 was as
follows: 2000 (eight), 2001 (seven), 2002 (10), 2003 (eight), 2004 (10), 2005 (five), and 2006 (10). All 58 decedents
were male; mean age was 39 years. Forty-three (74%) of the fatalities resulted from the loss (i.e., capsizing or sinking) of
23 fishing vessels, 11 (19%) resulted from persons falling overboard, and four (7%) resulted from other incidents
involving deck injuries or diving injuries.
Among the 43 fatalities that resulted from vessel loss, weather conditions were a contributing factor in 34
deaths (79%); other contributing factors included large waves (17 [40%]), flooding (16 [37%]), and vessel instability
(11 [26%]) (Table 1). Among the 11 deaths that resulted from falling overboard, none of the persons wore a
personal flotation device. Contributing factors in these deaths
included being alone (six deaths [55%]), slipping or tripping
(six [55%]), gear entanglement (three [27%]), wet or slippery deck (three [27%]), and alcohol or drug use by a
decedent (three [27%]) (Table 1).
None of the 43 persons whose deaths resulted from vessel loss were able to enter a functional life raft. In 12 (28%)
of the fatalities, no life raft was aboard the vessel; however, seven of those deaths were among fishermen aboard skiffs
that were too small to carry a life raft. Other life raft complications included malfunctioning (12 [28%]) and inability
to reach a raft (9 [21%]) (Table 2).
Three (13%) of the 23 vessels that were lost had a current decal from a U.S. Coast Guard voluntary dockside
safety examination. Three vessels had expired decals (i.e., >2 years since the examination), and 12 vessels did not have a
decal and might have never participated in the safety examination program. Four vessels were skiffs and were not included
in the examination program; decal status was unknown for one vessel. Among fatalities in these 23 vessel losses,
three persons died despite successfully donning an immersion
suit*; 31 persons did not use an immersion suit,
and immersion suit use was unknown for the other nine persons. Information regarding how many of the vessels
had immersion suits aboard was not available.
The highest number of fatalities (23 [40%]) was reported from the shellfish fishery (including 17 from the
Northwest Dungeness crab fleet), followed by salmon and other pelagic fisheries (15 [26%]) and the groundfish fishery
(10 [17%]). Type of fishery was not identified for 10
fatalities.
The average annual number of FTE fishermen in the three states was 2,706. This number included annual averages
of 828 in the shellfish fisheries (including 524 in the Northwest Dungeness crab fleet), 1,084 in the salmon and
other pelagic fisheries, and 794 in the groundfish fisheries. The
average annual fatality rate for all fisheries in the
three-state area during 2000--2006 was 238 deaths per 100,000 FTE fishermen. The shellfish fishery had the highest
average annual fatality rate (362 deaths per 100,000 FTE fishermen); within that fishery, the rate for the Northwest
Dungeness crab fleet was higher still (463 deaths per 100,000 FTE fishermen). The salmon and other pelagic fisheries had a
fatality rate of 132 deaths per 100,000 FTE fishermen, and the groundfish fisheries had a rate of 72 deaths per 100,000
FTE fishermen.
Reported by:
J Lincoln PhD, D Lucas, MS, Alaska Pacific Regional Office, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC.
Editorial Note:
Commercial fishing has long been associated with high fatality rates; however, this report is the first
to identify the most hazardous Pacific Coast fisheries outside of Alaska. The findings reveal that, during 2000--2006,
the average annual fatality rate for commercial fishing deaths reported from California, Oregon, and Washington
was approximately double the national fishing fatality rate of 115 deaths per 100,000 workers
(
1) and also double the Alaska rate of 107 per 100,000 FTE fishermen during the same period (CDC, unpublished data, 2008).
The analysis indicates that the Pacific Coast fishery with the greatest hazard, during 2000--2006, was the
Northwest Dungeness crab fishery. Although Alaska's Bering Sea crab fishery has been described as the most dangerous fishery,
data from this analysis indicate that the Northwest Dungeness crab fleet had a greater number of fatalities and a
higher fatality rate during 2000--2006. During that
period, the number of fatalities in the Bering Sea crab fishery was 11,
and the fatality rate was 305 deaths per 100,000 FTE fishermen (CDC, unpublished data, 2008). By comparison,
the number of deaths in the Northwest Dungeness crab fishery during 2000--2006 was 17, with a fatality rate of
463
deaths per 100,000 FTE fishermen. The Bering Sea rate represents a 60% reduction from the rate of 768 deaths
per 100,000 FTE fishermen recorded during 1990--1999 (CDC, unpublished data, 2008).
Concern over the high fatality rates in Alaska during the 1990s led to institution of various safety measures.
For example, in 1999, a preseason dockside enforcement program that ensures vessels are not overloaded with crab pots
and that primary safety equipment is present and maintained
was developed and implemented by the U.S. Coast Guard
in Alaska (
4). A similar program, tailored to the Dungeness crab fleet, might reduce deaths in the Northwest
Dungeness crab fishery.
The U.S. Coast Guard has primary jurisdiction over the safety of the U.S. commercial fishing fleet,
enforcing regulations of the U.S. Commercial Fishing Industry Vessel Safety Act of 1988
(CFIVSA)†
with at-sea boardings, during which officers check for illegal fishing
activities, illicit drugs, and safety violations. CFIVSA regulations
focus primarily on saving lives after the loss of a vessel and not on
preventing vessels from capsizing or sinking, falls overboard, or
injuries on deck. CFIVSA regulations require that commercial fishing
vessels carry various equipment (e.g., life rafts, radio beacons, and
immersion suits) depending on the size of the vessel and the area in
which it operates.
Of particular concern in this study are the results showing a lack of use of life rafts and immersion suits.
CFIVSA requirements for life rafts and immersion suits likely contributed to a survival rate of 94% among commercial
fishermen aboard vessels that sank or capsized during 1997--1999 in Alaska; this rate was up from 73% in 1991
(
2). CDC determined that, during 1992--2004, survivors of vessel sinkings in Alaska were approximately seven times more
likely to have worn an immersion suit than decedents in these events and 15 times more likely to have used a life raft
(CDC, unpublished data, 2008). To improve survival chances among
Pacific Coast fishermen, added emphasis should be
placed on formal marine safety training in the deployment and use of life rafts and immersion suits.
The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, unlike the methodology used in this
study, national fatality rates for commercial fishermen are not calculated based on FTE fishermen but are calculated
using annual average estimates of employed civilians aged
>16 years and deaths from the Census of Fatal
Occupational Injuries. Therefore, the national rates might not be directly comparable to the rates calculated in this study
for California, Oregon, and Washington. Second, fatality rates for the three states do not include the number of fatalities
or FTE fishermen in certain small-scale fisheries where deaths occurred. Finally, certain information (e.g., type of fishery
or immersion suit usage) was not available for all fatal events. The U.S. Coast Guard is working with CDC to improve
data-collection instruments so that investigating Coast Guard officers can produce more complete
reports.
Safety improvements in the Alaska commercial fishing industry during the 1990s did not occur because of a
single intervention. Several interventions were implemented, including requirements for emergency gear, development
of hands-on safety training, and tailored safety interventions addressing specific hazards for particular fishing fleets.
The findings in this report suggest that safety interventions should be tailored to specific groups of vessels and
emphasis should be placed on the Northwest Dungeness crab fleet, with targeted preseason safety inspections and safety
and stability training. Other areas of emphasis should include improved weather reporting, training in the deployment
and use of life rafts, and increased training in the use of immersion suits and personal flotation devices.
Acknowledgments
This report is based, in part, on contributions by U.S. Coast
Guard personnel from Districts 11, 13, and 17 and staff members with
the Oregon and Washington Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation
Programs.
References
- US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Injuries, illnesses, and fatalities: Census of Fatal Occupational
Injuries (CFOI)---current and revised data. Washington, DC: US
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2008. Available at http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm.
- CDC. Surveillance and prevention of occupational injuries in
Alaska: a decade of progress, 1990--1999. Cincinnati, OH: US Department
of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health; 2002. NIOSH publication no. 2002-115. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002-115/pdfs/2002-115.pdf.
- CDC. Fatal injuries to civilian workers in the United States,
1980--1995. Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health and Human Services,
CDC, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2001. NIOSH
publication no. 2001-129. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2001-129/2001129pd.html.
- C Medlicott. Using dockside enforcement to compel compliance and
improve safety. In: Proceedings of the International Fishing Industry
Safety and Health Conference. Woods Hole, MA: October 23--25, 2000.
Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC,
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH
publication no. 2003-102.
* One person who drowned wore the immersion suit improperly;
another person wore the suit properly but died from head trauma after
striking his head on rocks; the third person wore the suit properly but
drowned, with no indication of head trauma.
† Requirements for commercial fishing industry vessels. 46 CFR part 28.
Table 1
![TABLE 1. Number and percentage of fatalities* from commercial fishing vessel loss or falls overboard, by contributing factors — California, Oregon, and Washington, 2000–2006 Contributing factor† No. (%) Vessel loss Weather conditions 34 (79) Struck by large wave 17 (40) Flooding 16 (37) Instability 11 (26) Grounding 8 (19) Crossing hazardous sandbar 7 (16) Illicit drugs used by any crew member 6 (14) Open door or hatch 3 (7) Fatigue experienced by any crew member 2 (5) Alcohol used by any crew member 1 (2) Falls overboard Alone (not witnessed) 6 (55) Trip or slip 6 (55) Gear entanglement 3 (27) Wet or slippery deck 3 (27) Alcohol or drugs used by the decedent 3 (27) Lost balance 2 (18) Ropes on deck 2 (18) Fatigue experienced by the decedent 2 (18) Vessel motion 1 (9) *Vessel loss (n = 43 [23 vessels]); falls overboard (n = 11). †Fatalities might have had more than one contributing factor.](http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/figures/m716a2t1.gif)
Return to top.
Table 2

Return to top.
Figure

Return to top.
|
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are
provided as a service to
MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply
endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content
of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in
MMWR were current as of
the date of publication. |
Disclaimer
All
MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text
into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version.
Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or
the original
MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables.
An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents,
U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800.
Contact GPO for current prices.
**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to
mmwrq@cdc.gov.
Date last reviewed: 4/24/2008