Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Foodconsumer & Others


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards


General Health : Diseases Last Updated: Apr 20, 2011 - 9:38:09 AM


Self-Reported Prediabetes and Risk-Reduction Activities --- United States, 2006
By CDC
Nov 10, 2008 - 10:35:59 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
Weekly
November 7, 2008 / 57(44);1203-1205

Self-Reported Prediabetes and Risk-Reduction Activities --- United States, 2006

At least one fourth of U.S. adults are known to have prediabetes, a condition defined as having impaired fasting glucose (plasma glucose level of 100 to <126 mg/dL after an overnight fast), impaired glucose tolerance (plasma glucose level of 140 to <200 mg/dL after a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test), or both ( 1--3). Persons with prediabetes are at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and stroke ( 3--5). However, lifestyle changes can prevent or delay development of diabetes and its complications among persons with prediabetes ( 3,5). To assess the prevalence of self-reported prediabetes among U.S. adults and the prevalence of activities that can reduce the risk for diabetes, CDC analyzed responses to questions regarding prediabetes asked for the first time in the 2006 National Health Interview Survey. This report summarizes the results of that analysis, which determined that, although at least one fourth of U.S. adults are known to have prediabetes through surveys that included laboratory testing, in 2006, only an estimated 4% of U.S. adults had been told they had prediabetes. Among those who had been told they had prediabetes, 68% had tried to lose or control weight, 55% had increased physical activity or exercise, 60% had reduced dietary fat or calories, and 42% had engaged in all three activities. Persons at greater risk for diabetes should be tested according to published recommendations, and persons with prediabetes should lose or control their weight and increase their physical activity to reduce their risk for developing diabetes.

NHIS is an annual, nationally representative, household probability survey of the noninstitutionalized, U.S. civilian population, conducted by face-to-face interview ( 6). In 2006, the survey included 24,275 adults aged >18 years. NHIS sample weights were calibrated to 2000 U.S. census-based totals for sex, age, and race/ethnicity. The total household response rate was 87%, and 81% of persons identified as sample adults completed the interview, yielding a final response rate of 71% for the adult sample ( 6).

All participants who did not answer "yes" to the question "Other than during pregnancy, have you ever been told by a doctor or health professional that you have diabetes or sugar diabetes?" were asked five additional questions: "Have you ever been told by a doctor or health-care professional that you have 1) prediabetes? 2) impaired fasting glucose? 3) impaired glucose tolerance? 4) borderline diabetes? or 5) high blood sugar?" Prediabetes was defined as answering "yes" to at least one of these five questions. Under this definition, 984 participants reported having been told they had prediabetes.

NHIS participants also were asked three questions about their risk-reduction activities: "People often engage in activities to lower their risk for health problems or certain diseases. During the past 12 months have you 1) been trying to control or lose weight? 2) increased your physical activity or exercise? or 3) reduced the amount of fat or calories in your diet?"

Prevalence of self-reported prediabetes was estimated by sex, age group, race/ethnicity, and weight status.* To make comparisons among the levels of each covariate while simultaneously adjusting for differences in the distributions of all the other covariates, adjusted percentages were estimated from a logistic regression model predicting prediabetes as a function of sex, age group, race/ethnicity, and weight status ( 7). Among those adults with self-reported prediabetes, estimates were made of the percentages told they had each of five conditions indicative of prediabetes (i.e., prediabetes itself, impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, borderline diabetes, or high blood sugar). Estimates then were made of the percentages with prediabetes who engaged in each of the three risk-reduction activities and the percentages who engaged in zero, one, two, or all three activities.

In 2006, an estimated 4.0% of U.S. adults had self-reported prediabetes (Table). Among them, 64.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 59.9%--68.7%) had been told they had borderline diabetes. Percentages for the other four conditions indicative of prediabetes were as follows: high blood sugar, 38.3% (CI = 34.3%--42.5%); prediabetes itself, 33.7% (CI = 30.3%--37.3%); impaired glucose tolerance, 15.5% (CI = 12.3%--19.2%); and impaired fasting glucose, 15.2% (CI = 12.4%--18.6%). In addition, 43.3% (CI = 39.5%--47.3%) had been told that they had two or more of the five conditions.

The estimated prevalence of self-reported prediabetes increased with age, ranging from 2.7% among those aged 18--44 years to 6.0% among those aged >65 years (Table). Prevalence also increased with weight status: 2.3% among those with normal weight, 3.9% among those categorized as overweight, and 6.3% among those categorized as obese. Prediabetes was more prevalent among women (4.8%) than men (3.2%). No significant differences were observed in prevalence by race/ethnicity.

Among adults with self-reported prediabetes, 67.6% (CI = 63.7%--71.4%) had been trying to lose or control weight during the preceding 12 months, 59.8% (CI = 55.6%--64.0%) had reduced dietary fat or calories, and 54.7% (CI = 50.7%--58.7%) had increased physical activity or exercise. Although 42.1% (CI = 38.0%--46.3%) reported engaging in all three activities during the preceding 12 months, 23.9% (CI = 20.3%--27.4%) had not engaged in any of these risk-reduction activities (Figure).

Reported by: DR Rolka, MS, NR Burrows, MPH, Y Li, MPH, LS Geiss, MA, Div of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

Editorial Note:

This report provides the first nationally representative estimates of the prevalence of self-reported prediabetes in the U.S. adult population and the first estimates of the prevalence of risk-reduction activities among adults who had been told they had prediabetes. The results indicate that, in 2006, only 4% of U.S. adults were aware they had prediabetes or a condition indicative of prediabetes. In addition, 24% of U.S. adults with prediabetes did not participate in any of three recommended risk-reduction activities

The finding of 4% self-reported prevalence of prediabetes is low compared with the 26% of U.S. adults aged >20 years estimated to have impaired fasting glucose based on laboratory test results in the 2003--2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) ( 1). Other NHANES data, from 1988--1994, indicate an even higher prevalence of prediabetes among persons aged 40--74 years. During that period, NHANES conducted oral glucose tolerance tests of persons in that age group and estimated that 40% of adults aged 40--74 years had impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or both ( 2).

The low prevalence of self-reported prediabetes described in this report likely indicates a low level of awareness among persons who have prediabetes. Prediabetes is a relatively new term that came into wider use beginning in 2002, after publication of results from the Diabetes Prevention Program intervention trial ( 5). Physicians and other health-care providers have used various other terms to describe prediabetes. The use of different terms might have produced confusion among persons over what their health-care providers diagnosed.

The results of this analysis also might indicate that a large percentage of persons with prediabetes have not been tested or diagnosed. The tests used to screen for prediabetes are the same as those used to screen for diabetes, and the population at risk for prediabetes is the same population as that at risk for type 2 diabetes. Hence, screening recommendations for prediabetes are essentially the same as those for diabetes ( 3). The American Diabetes Association has recommended that testing for prediabetes and diabetes be considered for adults who meet certain criteria (Box ( 8).

The Diabetes Prevention Program intervention trial showed that diet and exercise can lower the incidence of type 2 diabetes by 58% over 3 years among those at high risk for diabetes ( 5). Trial participants lost weight by reducing dietary fat and calories and by exercising at least 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week. The American Diabetes Association recommends that clinicians counsel patients with prediabetes on weight loss of 5--10% of body weight and on increasing physical activity to at least 150 minutes of moderate activity (e.g., walking) per week. Metformin administration should be considered under certain circumstances ( 8). However, the results in this report indicate that, although 42% of adults with prediabetes tried to lose or control weight, reduce fat or calories, and increase physical activity, one fourth did not engage in any of these risk-reduction activities.

The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, NHIS interviews are household based and do not include persons who are institutionalized, including those living in nursing homes. Second, the 2006 NHIS questions regarding self-reported prediabetes were asked for the first time. Hence, no previous studies are available for comparison and validation.

Interventions to prevent or delay onset of type 2 diabetes in persons with prediabetes are feasible and cost effective, and lifestyle interventions are more cost effective than medications ( 9). The gap in prevalence between those with prediabetes and those aware of their condition presents an opportunity to reduce the burden of diabetes by increasing awareness of prediabetes and encouraging adoption of healthier lifestyles and risk-reduction activities.

References

  1. Cowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-Holt DD, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U.S. population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999--2002. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1263--8.
  2. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1998--1994. Diabetes Care 1998;21:518--24.
  3. Nathan DM, Davidson MB, DeFronzo RA, et al. Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: implications for care. Diabetes Care 2007;30:753--9.
  4. Coutinho M, Gerstein HC, Wang Y, Yusuf S. The relationship between glucose and incident cardiovascular events. A metaregression analysis of published data from 20 studies of 95,783 individuals followed for 12.4 years. Diabetes Care 1999;22:233--40.
  5. Knowler WC, Barrett-Conner E, Fowler SE, et al; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002;346:393--403.
  6. CDC. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Questionnaires, datasets, and related documentation. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm.
  7. Graubard BI, Korn EL. Predictive margins with survey data. Biometrics 1999;55:652--9.
  8. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes---2008. Diabetes Care 2008;31(Suppl 1):S12--54.
  9. Herman WH, Hoerger TJ, Brandle M, et al; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The cost-effectiveness of lifestyle modification or metformin in preventing type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired glucose tolerance. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:323--32.

* Categorized as normal weight (body mass index [BMI] of <25 kg/m2), overweight (25 to <30 kg/m2), or obese ( >30 kg/m2), using height and weight reported by participant.

Table

TABLE. Number and percentage of adults aged >18 years with self-reported prediabetes,* by selected characteristics — National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2006 Characteristic No. reporting prediabetes Estimated no. of U.S. adults % (95% CI†) Adjusted %§ (95% CI) Total 984 8,833,309 4.0 (3.7–4.4) — — Sex Men 351 3,409,372 3.2 (2.8–3.7) 3.2 (2.7–3.6) Women 633 5,423,937 4.8 (4.3–5.3) 4.8 (4.3–5.3) Age group (yrs) 18–44 322 3,017,364 2.7 (2.4–3.2) 2.9 (2.4–3.3) 45–64 385 3,684,869 5.0 (4.4–5.7) 4.7 (4.1–5.3) >65 277 2,131,076 6.0 (5.2–6.9) 5.9 (5.0–6.7) Race/Ethnicity Hispanic 152 948,378 3.3 (2.8–4.0) 3.6 (3.0–4.3) White, non-Hispanic 609 6,463,265 4.2 (3.8–4.7) 4.1 (3.6–4.6) Black, non-Hispanic 179 1,008,987 3.9 (3.3–4.7) 3.7 (3.0–4.4) Asian, non-Hispanic 35 272,982 2.8 (1.8–4.2) 3.7 (2.2–5.2) Weight status¶ Normal 225 1,888,507 2.3 (1.9–2.8) 2.3 (1.9–2.7) Overweight 325 2,858,764 3.9 (3.4–4.5) 4.0 (3.5–4.6) Obese 434 4,086,038 6.3 (5.6–7.1) 6.2 (5.4–6.9) * Defined as having impaired fasting glucose (plasma glucose level of 100 to <126 mg/dL after an overnight fast), impaired glucose tolerance (plasma glucose level of 140 to <200 mg/dL after a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test), or both. † Confidence interval. § Calculated from a logistic regression model that included sex, age group, race/ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI) category. ¶ Normal weight, overweight, and obese are defined as BMI of <25 kg/m2, 25 to <30 kg/m2, or >30 kg/m2, respectively, using height and weight reported by participant.
Return to top.
Figure

FIGURE. Percentage of adults aged >18 years with self-reported prediabetes* who participated in selected activities that reduce risk for diabetes — National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2006
Return to top.
Box

BOX. Criteria for testing for prediabetes and diabetes in asymptomatic adults 1. Testing should be considered in all adults who are overweight (body mass index >25 kg/m2*) and have any of the following additional risk factors: • physical inactivity; • first-degree relative with diabetes; • members of a high-risk ethnic population (e.g., African American, Latino, Native American, Asian American, and Pacific Islander); • women who delivered a baby weighing >9 lb or diagnosed with gestational diabetes; • hypertension (>140/90 mmHg or on therapy for hypertension); • HDL cholesterol level <35 mg/dL (0.90 mmol/L) and/or a triglyceride level >250 mg/dL (2.82 mmol/L); • women with polycystic ovarian syndrome; • impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose on previous testing; • other clinical conditions associated with insulin resistance (e.g., severe obesity and acanthosis nigricans); or • history of cardiovascular disease. 2. In the absence of these risk factors, testing for prediabetes and diabetes should begin at age 45 years 3. If results are normal, testing should be repeated at least at 3-year intervals, with consideration of more frequent testing depending on initial results and risk status. SOURCE: American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2008. Diabetes Care 2008;31(Suppl 1):S12–54. * At-risk body mass index might be lower in certain populations.
Return to top.

Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.


References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from typeset documents. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov. Date last reviewed: 11/6/2008




© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












We have moved to Food Consumer . Org



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | Buy Viagra | MarketAmerica.com |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | DaytonaCPA.com | Take Your Blog to a Higher Level
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.