Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Letter to Editor
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search






Search Consumer Health


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Submit news[release]
General health News



Get to know importance of water
Water for Life USA KYK Harmony Water Ionizer


More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards

General Health : Diseases Last Updated: Apr 16, 2008 - 5:52:06 PM


Don’t rush to treat prostate cancer!
By David Liu, Ph.D.
Feb 13, 2008 - 3:39:19 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   

WEDNESDAY FEB 13, 2008 (foodconsumer.org) -- Got prostate cancer?   Do not rush to accept any treatment as chances are good that a prostate cancer patient may die more likely from other diseases or conditions than prostate cancer or its complications, according to a new study.   A right approach researchers suggested patients adopt is "wait and watch".

Dr. Grace Lu_Yau, a cancer epidemiologist at the Cancer Institute of New Jersey and associate professor at UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School said patients need to compare both the potential survival benefits and the potential side effects of various treatments with the benefits and possible negative impact the patient may have if the cancer is left untreated.

The study presented at the 2008 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium held in San Francisco found although prostate cancer is found in one in every six men in the United States, many of the malignancies are slow-growers and there is no way to determine which men would benefit from any treatment, Lu-Yau was cited by healthday.com as saying.

At present, one controversial test known as prostate-specific antigen or PSA blood testing is commonly used to detect prostate cancer although this method is notoriously unreliable. In effect, only 10-15% of men with high PSA need a prostate biopsy and only 2-3 percent will require any treatment, according to BBC News.

The current study was based on data on more than 9,000 men at a mean age of 77 years with State I or II prostate cancer diagnosed between 1992 and 2002 who elected not to be treated.

The researchers found 72 percent of these men died of causes unrelated to prostate cancer and the rest of patients or 2,675 of them received treatment ten years after diagnosis.

Lu-Yau said the treatment for elderly men with localized prostate canner most likely has only a modest therapeutic effect and therefore it is critical to weigh the risk of having side effects of various treatments including possible cancer-related implications after the treatment.

Prostate cancer hits 218,890 U.S. men and kills 27,050 in 2007. Environmental modifiable risk factors include a healthy diet.   Generally speaking, eating meats and dairy products may increase the risk of developing prostate cancer while consuming plant-food rich diet may reduce the risk.

For more information on how to eat to prevent prostate cancer, read Eat fit to prevent prostate cancer.

 

Web link: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/prostate





© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page







Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | abou t us | newsletter | contact us
link partners: | shopseek.com | infoplus.com | foodregister.com | uscards.com | beyondcreditcards.com | USMortgage101.com

© Copyright 2004 - 2007 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.